From "Save the Environment"
Monday, February 18, 2013
UN Population Fund to the Centerpiece of US Foreign Policy?
From "Save the Environment"
Does the UN believe overpopulation the cause of climate change?
From "The Truth"
To The Global Elite The Math Is Simple: Human Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change So The Solution To Climate Change Is Population Control
Sustainable Development, Agenda 21 and Population Control
Taken from "The American Dream"
Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control
Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.
“One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children.You have to lift child survival rates so that parents feel comfortable having small families and most important — you have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.”
“….population growth rates have been declining globally, largely as a result of expanded basic education and health care. That trend is projected to lead to a stable world population in the middle of the twenty-first century… The current decline in population growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies that promote economic development, social development, environmental protection, and poverty eradication, particularly the further expansion of basic education, with full and equal access for girls and women, and health care, including reproductive health care, including both family planning and sexual health, consistent with the report of the International Conference on Population and Development.”
What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?
You really do have to wonder whether a few years from now we’ll look back at the first decade of the 21st century — when food prices spiked, energy prices soared, world population surged, tornados plowed through cities, floods and droughts set records, populations were displaced and governments were threatened by the confluence of it all — and ask ourselves: What were we thinking? How did we not panic when the evidence was so obvious that we’d crossed some growth/climate/natural resource/population redlines all at once?
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”
Wall Street Insiders Expect BIG Market Movement Soon
Found on the Economic Collapse Blog.
Do Wall Street Insiders Expect Something Really BIG To Happen Very Soon?
Corporate insiders have one word for investors: sell.Insiders were nine times more likely to sell shares of their companies than buy new ones last week, according to the Vickers Weekly Insider report by Argus Research.
"In almost perfect coordination with an equity market that was rushing toward new all-time highs, insider sentiment has weakened sharply — falling to its lowest level since late March 2012," wrote David Coleman of the Vickers Weekly Insider report, one of the longest researchers of executive buying and selling on Wall Street. "Insiders are waving the cautionary flag in an increasingly aggressive manner."There have been more than nine insider sales for every one buy over the past week among NYSE stocks, according to Vickers. The last time executives sold their company's stock this aggressively was in early 2012, just before the S&P 500 went on to correct by 10 percent to its low for the year."Insiders know more than the vast majority of market participants," said Enis Taner, global macro editor for RiskReversal.com. "And they're usually right over a long period of time."
According to Barron's columnist Steven Sears,someone made a big bet against the financialsETF yesterday (ticker symbol XLF), and it has everybody buzzing.The trader bought 100,000 put options on the ETF (a put option increases in value when the price of the underlying asset, in this case, the ETF, goes down).To put that number in perspective, Sears writes, "Few investors ever trade more than 500 contracts, so a 100,000 order tends to stop traffic and prompt all sorts of speculation about what's motivating the trade." According to Sears, the trade "has sparked conversations across the market."
A Very Big Bet In A Somewhat Unlikely Instrument – My friend, Jim Brown, the ever-alert consummate professional over at Option Investor pointed us to a rather unusual trade. Here's what he wrote in last night's edition of his valuable newsletter:In past years I have reported on trades that were so large it appeared someone had inside knowledge of a pending event. Sometimes those were massive put positions on the S&P. A new trade just appeared that suggests there will be a market event in the near future. Last week somebody put on a call spread on the VIX using the April 20 and 25 puts. They bought 150,000 contracts for a net of $75 per contract. That is an $11,250,000 bet that the VIX will move over 20 over the next 60 days. You would have to be VERY confident in your outlook to risk $11 million on a directional position with the VIX at five year lows and the markets trying to break out to new highs.
I continue to believe that the S&P500 can trade up towards the 1575/1550 area, where we have, so far, a grand double top. I would not be surprised to see the S&P trade marginally through the 2007 all-time nominal high (the real high was of course seen over a decade ago – so much for equities as a long-term vehicle for wealth creation!). A weekly close at a new all-time high would I think lead to the final parabolic spike up which creates the kind of positioning extreme and leverage extreme needed to create the conditions for a 25% to 50% collapse in equities over the rest of 2013 and 2014, driven by real economy reality hitting home, and by policymaker failure/loss of faith in "their system".
Hundreds of people jostled for free vegetables handed out by farmers in a symbolic protest earlier on Wednesday, trampling one man and prompting an outcry over the growing desperation created by economic crisis.Images of people struggling to seize bags of tomatoes and leeks thrown from a truck dominated television, triggering a bout of soul-searching over the new depths of poverty in the debt-laden country.
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Is Hemp the Pancea to Energy Ills?
Agenda21 can be defeated if enough of us move out to the countryside and form communities resistant to foreign and domestic terror and tyranny, that are resource and energy self sufficient - to a greater extent than we are now.
By creating hemp businesses, we can improve our health, safety, and psychological well being.
We can exercise our inalienable right to self defense and disobey the corrupt laws of the government that are worthy of revolution.
Support decriminalization of industrial non narcotic hemp. Plant the seed, it will grow like a weed until it is harvested by bio friendly farmers who make environmentally safe and energy net neutral products.
Those products would include clothing, fuels for cars, trains, and planes. It will include plastics as hard as steel and food as safe and natural as god intended.
Stop this nonsense of supporting one puppet or the other. We are all being played by twisted politics of the new world order and the high canals. Cartels of billionaire gangsters oil the machine of tyranny with money not printed but materialized out of thin air.
The Federal Reserve should be audited ASAP. The S&P ratings lawsuit should be on every channel and we should all be asking lots of questions, filing lawsuits, protesting, boycotting, and pushing back this criminal activity that is destroying the planet.
Forget climate change, we need to stop the invasion of the foreign bankers from beheading our society and enslaving us all.
We have to start with learning about Agenda 21. Figure out if your city or town is on the crosshairs of the UN.
Defund think tanks like the CFR, Rand, public private operations like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Federal Reserve, IRS.
They have our military by the balls with their lobbyists from Israel and Saudi Arabia, The City of London, and the British Royal Crown.
Do your homework and you will see, the same monopolies have controlled us for centuries.
You will see that the first declaration of independence was written on hemp paper by men who smoked it. If we can't do either in America today, then we are not as free as they were at that moment. 1776.
Get it?
Saturday, February 9, 2013
Is the Bay Area Merger and Breakup of California part of United Nations Agenda 21?
From February 9, 2013:
Sitting down for lunch with the family on Saturday the following headline in the San Mateo Daily Journal caught my eye.
Most people probably read the article and thought "oh how wonderful, they will be able to achieve certain economic efficiencies by consolidating governments, structuring better public transportation connections, and so forth.
Bay Area leaders consider merger
The article begins explaining how business and civic leaders gathered in San Jose to "consider the advantages of merging the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley into a single region, sharing everything from city dumps to water treatment plants as communities sprawl across borders."
The article goes on to say:
So apparently there are economic, environmental, and social crises in the area that need to be addressed. PROBLEM."Leaders attending the State of the Valley conference Friday noted that Bay Area residents, businesses and local governments face the same challenges, from gridlock and earthquakes to steep housing prices and climate change."
Most people would agree that there are a plethora of issues in the Bay Area, but in general it is a pleasant place to live. It's true we have one of the world's most expensive housing markets in the world, but we also have fairly stable and near maximized employment. It's true we have horrific public schools despite collecting an enormous amount of money from property taxes, but most who can afford it send their kids to private schools, or rent houses in Cupertino so their kids can go to amazing public schools. We also have at least 2 separate train systems (Caltrain and BART) that do not coordinate well with each other nor with the bus systems, but apart from Denver, Chicago and New York City no American cities have decent public transportation. Regardless, the Bay Area is running fairly well. Many disagree and therein lies the REACTION.
The articles continues with the stated public objective of the proposal. SOLUTION
If we just merge our diaspora of cities around the bay, we will continue to achieve economic growth. I didn't know that was an issue. I mean we all know that California proper is near bankruptcy following the global economic crisis of 2008, but the Silicon Valley and most of the Bay Area has hardly been disturbed....the region, which amounts to the world’s 13th-largest economy, should continue to boom if they coordinate their planning and consider merging transit systems, police and fire services and even city governments.Technology forecaster Paul Saffo told conference participants that sharing everything from landfills to police helicopters could make the entire area more efficient, save money and help businesses remain competitive.
Saving money, cutting bureaucratic waste, and achieving economies of scale are all wonderful theoretical objectives. That is rarely what happens when power centers are created. Look at Washington DC. But that doesnt stop the virtuous solicitations of POWER.
This must be the true objective. To create powerful city states like Rome, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Perhaps this is to counter the powerless small towns that collectively make up the region at this time.
“Powerful regions are the new basic unit of governments in the 21st century,” said Saffo, pointing to Singapore and Hong Kong. “City states are the powerful nexus of power, commerce, culture and identity.”
The whole conference was setup to meet following the release of a 2013 Index of Silicon Valley which found the region is leading the country out of the recession with 92,000 new jobs last year. It turns out the index and the conference were both sponsored by Joint Venture Silicon Valley Network and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, both nonprofits associated with the region’s businesses and governments.
Who is the Joint Venture Silicon Valley Network and what are their goals and objectives? According to their website it was
Established in 1993, Joint Venture Silicon Valley provides analysis and action on issues affecting our region's economy and quality of life. The organization brings together established and emerging leaders—from business, government, academia, labor and the broader community—to spotlight issues and work toward innovative solutions.They have an interesting list of private sector sponsors, many who have been bailed out or have nefarious connections with the military industrial complex. Interestingly enough the public sector sponsors includes the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Why would they be interested in economic efficiencies and centralized power houses? Well, the Netherlands and the US are signatories to the United Nations Agenda 21 kicked off in 1992. Agenda 21 is a very controversial world government initiative that has been protested since its inception. From the UN USA website, it is defined as:
Many have exposed the nefarious hidden goals of the United Nations as an attempt at world government controlled by a royal elite with a collectivist agenda. Remember the US sponsor of the United Nations was Alger Hiss, a convicted communist spy and since its inception it has been sponsored by powerful tax exempt foundations belonging to the robber barons of the early 20th century, such as the Rockefellers.Agenda 21 encourages, rather than compels, UN Member States to take into consideration the environmental impacts of their land, resources, and transportation development policies. Adopted at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, the document reflects a broad international consensus that worsening poverty and growing stresses on the environment require greater integration between environmental and development concerns.
It is clear that this article is insufficient in revealing the smoking gun behind a global conspiracy to drive us into slavery but it should be a good start to spark legitimate investigation by those who would be affected.
The questions we should be asking are:
- What are the connections to Agenda 21?
- Who would benefit from the merger of regional cities?
- Who would lead such an regional powerhouse? Would they be elected or technocratic appointees of the elite?
- How will a larger bureaucracy of concentrated power be more efficient and to the benefit of local residents? The larger the governmental unit, the greater the prospects for significant corruption. Haven't we seen the Federal Government become a corrupt and tyrannical tool of a wealthy elite?Why would a new city state be any different?
- Where will decisions be made about zoning, licensing, and permits?
- Will it negate or make obsolete the local city councils?
- Will there be a regional banking entity and will it be private or public?
- What will it have in common with the Vatican, DC, and the City of London?
- Wouldn't smaller service suppliers be crowded out to larger organizations that supposedly have greater economies of scale? That means local businesses and start up will be squeezed out of the market. This is what critics of Walmart complain about.
- Where will our food supply come from? If we continue to build and develop housing and industry at the expense of farming, aren't we increasing our dependence on imported foods and our risk associated?
- Will GMOs be acceptable food sources for this new City State?
- How will this affect local public schools?
"Powerful regions are the new basic unit of governments in the 21st century ... City states are the powerful nexus of power, commerce, culture and identity."Read more at http://www.i4u.com/2013/02/paul-saffo/area-merging-leaders-region-bay-consider#S23PrssUQhjk0kem.99
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Americans-should-talk-about-politics-more-2336100.php#ixzz2L09wP3BM
- Member WEF Global Agenda Council on Innovation
- Member, WEF Global Agenda Council on Strategic Foresight
Only time will tell, just remember the old adage: