Plan To Split California Into Six States Moves Forward

Confronting David Rockefeller - Sunday Update

Maddow Pushes New FBI Director To Release Report On The FBI Assassinatio...

Obama's Next Assassination Target

Who are the #Top100Whistleblowers of the 21st century? #TributetoMCR

Use the hashtag #Top100Whistleblowers to help create a list of the most revealing whistleblowers of the 21st century.  My guess is that Edward Snowden will top the list, but it will also include Michael Ruppert, Richard Grove, Susan Lindauer, and many many more!

Over 80 videos and 50+ hours of documentaries of brave men and women that stood up to the #HighCabal.  Some of them are no longer with us and if we don't hear their message and take appropriate action, history could repeat itself.



If this awesome collection of stories starts to blow your mind, make you cynical, and you start to lose hope, then turn to the Peace Revolution Podcast for a breath of fresh air and a step in the light direction.

#TributetoMCR

Conflicting Reports on Mystery Poliolike Illness in California

Recently this article on a rare polio-like illness found in California came to my attention and I began to look around at what other sites were saying.  Then the news clearly was not adding up, looking as if there are no clear sources.  There are too many inconsistencies.  

I am not suggesting a conspiracy, but I am suggesting that it is very very difficult to get good journalism these days, and I am highly suspicious of anything that mainstream corporate owned media puts out because of the simple fact that they will NOT cover any good news (such as Public Banking), and only cover things their advertisers (BigPharma) allow them to cover.

It seems unnecessary to get all worked up about it.  25 cases seems minuscule compared to deaths caused by other diseases and illnesses.  The original story is about up to 25 cases of the polio-like illness in California, but the polio related sub-story really caught my attention.  

Yahoo reports:

Polio, an infectious disease that invades the nervous system and mainly affects young children, became one of the most dreaded diseases of the 20th century in the United States.
There is no known cure for polio, which is "mainly spread by person-to-person contact and eating or drinking items contaminated with the feces of an infected person," according to the Centers for Disease Control.
A vaccination was developed in 1954 and a global push to eradicate the disease, launched in 1988 (right about the time that AIDS broke out), resulted in a sharp decline in polio cases. According to the World Health Organization, just 223 cases were reported in 2012.
In 2013, a polio outbreak in Syria resulted in more than 60 suspected cases. Officials blamed the outbreak on a lack of vaccinations in the war-torn country.
Van Haren said additional tests confirmed the affected children in California "definitely do not have polio."

USAToday reports:

Poliovirus is part of the Picornaviridae family, which also includes enteroviruses and rhinoviruses (better known as the common cold). There are more than 100 types of enterovirus that cause 10 million to 15 million infections in the United States each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  (CNN reports the same.)
The poliovirus has been eradicated in the United States for more than 30 years. Only three countries in the world are not yet free of the disease: Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria, according to the World Health Organization.

ABC News reports:

The children had been vaccinated against polio and tests later confirmed that their illness was not that disease. Polio was eradicated in the U.S. more than 30 years ago.

This article says:

Since the start of the year, 18 cases of polio have been reported worldwide, according to the Council on Foreign Relations: one case in Karachi, Pakistan, and the rest in southeastern Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan.

Later it goes on to say:

In 2012, polio was identified in the following countries: Nigeria, Niger, Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, Afghanistan, Pakistan and one case in India. Polio is considered an epidemic in Nigeria. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, polio has emerged in clusters. Elsewhere the infectious disease outbreaks have been isolated cases. 

So which is it? Has it been eradicated or is it an epidemic in some countries? Was there a vaccine that cured it or is there in fact, no known cure? 

Then I reflected back on the YouTube documentaries I have seen in the past 12 months.  Some really scary sh*t when you know what I know about wealthy elitists, the United Nations Agenda 21 plan, and the medical industry ties to the Rockefellers.

Here are some interesting videos to consider:

The Greater Good Vaccines Documentary

Origin of AIDS: The Polio Vaccine (CBC 'Witness',  2004) 

CDC Admits 98 Million Americans Received Polio Vaccine Contaminated With Cancer Virus

Bill Gates on GM foods, vaccines and Monsanto 

The Origin of AIDS, the CIA and Army Biological Warfare

I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY - Dr Robert Gallo:  

  

Origin of AIDS: The Polio Vaccine (CBC 'Witness', 2004)

Matt Taibbi: Everything Is Rigged, The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever...

Hillary Clinton Admits that the CFR runs Foreign Policy

Trans Pacific Partnership: Starving Millions for the Profits of a Few

From TestosteronePit.com

Corporate Colonialism: Winners And Losers Of Global 'Free' Trade

SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2014 AT 8:13AM

By Don Quijones, a freelance writer and translator based in Barcelona, Spain. His blog, Raging Bull-Shit, is a modest attempt to challenge some of the wishful thinking and scrub away the lathers of soft soap peddled by our political and business leaders and their loyal mainstream media.

“I think of globalisation as a light which shines brighter and brighter on a few people, and the rest are in darkness, wiped out” – Arundhati Roy

On February 12th of this year, the presidents of Mexico, Colombia, Peru and Chile signed an agreement to eliminate tariffs on 92 percent of trade among their countries. The agreement is seen as vital in the economic integration of the four fastest-growing economies in Latin America, and a significant advance in their goal of working as a united trade partner with Asia.

At least that’s the official story, reported verbatim and with gushing enthusiasm by the mainstream financial and general press.

Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto called the pact the “largest [Mexico] has signed since the Free Trade Agreement with the United States” or NAFTA. Chile’s Sebastián Piñera emphasized the alliance’s openness, saying it is “not against anybody, only in favor of increasing the quality of life in our countries.”

However, as Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos acknowledged, there will be “winners and losers” along the way. The winners will inevitably be the same as always: big industry, big agriculture and big finance, including, of course, big domestic players such as Mexico’s Cemex and Chile’s Antofagasta. As for the losers, they will be the rest of society, in particular the poorest and most vulnerable.

Read more at Testosterone Pit.

The Draper Clan

As I am reading about Tim Draper's proposal to break up California into 6 States and its connections with the United Nations Agenda 21 operational plan, the Bay Area Merger, and the Council on Foreign Relations Project for a New American Century (PNAC), I looked back into his family's past.  it's easy to do with wealthy well known figures.  Just start looking on Wikipedia.  Here is what I found about his grandfather, William Henry Draper, Jr.

After retiring from public service a second time, he traveled to Mexico to serve as chairman of the Mexican Light and Power Company (1954–1959). Returning to the US in 1959, he formed the first West Coast venture capital firm Draper, Gaither and Anderson in California. In 1967 he retired from Draper Gaither, moved to Washington, D.C. and joined Combustion Engineering in New York as chairman, retiring a few years later to become the U.S. delegate to the United Nations Population Commission (1969–1971). He also co-founded the Population Crisis Committee in 1965 and chaired theDraper Committee.

William Henry Draper, Jr. was closely linked to Nazi Germany by none other than Professor Anthony Sutton in "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler"

At the end of World War II, Wall Street moved into Germany through the Control Council to protect their old cartel friends and limit the extent to which the denazification fervor would damage old business relationships. General Lucius Clay, the deputy military
governor for Germany, appointed businessmen who opposed denazification to positions of control over the denazification proceeds. William H. Draper of Dill. on, Read, the firm
which financed the German cartels back in the 1920s, became General Clay's deputy. 

Turns out Draper is very well connected - the Bush crime family.

Bush and Draper
Twenty years before he was U.S. President, George Bush brought two "race-science" professors in front of the Republican Task Force on Earth Resources and Population. As chairman of the Task Force, then-Congressman Bush invited Professors William Shockley and Arthur Jensen to explain to the committee how allegedly runaway birth-rates for African-Americans were "down-breeding" the American population.
Afterwards Bush personally summed up for the Congress the testimony his black-inferiority advocates had given to the Task Force [22]. George Bush held his hearings on the threat posed by black babies on August 5, 1969, while much of the world was in a better frame of mind--celebrating mankind's progress from the first moon landing 16 days earlier. Bush's obsessive thinking on this subject was guided by his family's friend, Gen. William H. Draper, Jr., the founder and chairman of the Population Crisis Committee, and vice chairman of the Planned Parenthood Federation. Draper had long been steering U.S. public discussion about the so-called "population bomb" in the non-white areas of the world.
If Congressman Bush had explained to his colleagues how his family had come to know General Draper, they would perhaps have felt some alarm, or even panic, and paid more healthy attention to Bush's presentation. Unfortunately, the Draper-Bush population doctrine is now official U.S. foreign policy.
William H. Draper, Jr. had joined the Bush team in 1927, when he was hired by Dillon Read & Co., New York investment bankers. Draper was put into a new job slot at the firm: handling the Thyssen account.
We recall that in 1924, Fritz Thyssen set up his Union Banking Corporation in George Herbert Walker's bank at 39 Broadway, Manhattan. Dillon Read & Co.'s boss, Clarence Dillon, had begun working with Fritz Thyssen sometime after Averell Harriman first met with Thyssen -- at about the time Thyssen began financing Adolf Hitler's political career.
In January 1926, Dillon Read created the German Credit and Investment Corporation. in Newark, New Jersey and Berlin, Germany, as Thyssen's short-term banker. That same year Dillon Read created the Vereinigte Stahlwerke ( German Steel Trust), incorporating the Thyssen family interests under the direction of New York and London finance. [23]
William H. Draper, Jr. was made director, vice president and assistant treasurer of the German Credit and Investment Corp. His business was short-term loans and financial management tricks for Thyssen and the German Steel Trust. Draper's clients sponsored Hitler's terroristic takeover; his clients led the buildup of the Nazi war industry; his clients made war against the United States. The Nazis were Draper's direct partners in Berlin and New Jersey: Alexander Kreuter, residing in Berlin, was president; Frederic Brandi, whose father was a top coal executive in the German Steel Trust, moved to the U.S. in 1926 and served as Draper's co-director in Newark.
Draper's role was crucial for Dillon Read & Co., for whom Draper was a partner and eventually vice president. The German Credit and Investment Corp. (GCI) was a "front" for Dillon Read: It had the same New Jersey address as U.S. & International Securities Corp. (USIS), and the same man served as treasurer of both firms. [24]
Clarence Dillon and his son C. Douglas Dillon were directors of USIS, which was spotlighted when Clarence Dillon was hauled before the Senate Banking Committee's famous "Pecora" hearings in 1933. USIS was shown to be one of the great speculative pyramid schemes which had swindled stockholders of hundreds of millions of dollars. These investment policies had rotted the U.S. economy to the core, and led to the Great Depression of the 1930s.
But William H. Draper, Jr.'s GCI "front" was not apparently affiliated with the USIS "front" or with Dillon, and the GCI escaped the Congressmen's limited scrutiny. This oversight was to prove most unfortunate, particularly to the 50 million people who subsequently died in World War II.
Dillon Read hired public relations man Ivy Lee to prepare their executives for their testimony and to confuse and further baffle the Congressmen [25]. Lee apparently took enough time out from his duties as image-maker for William S. Farish and the Nazi I.G. Farben Co.; he managed the congressional thinking so that the Congressmen did not disturb the Draper operation in Germany--and did not meddle with Thyssen, or interfere with Hitler's U.S. moneymen.
Thus in 1932, William H. Draper, Jr. was free to finance the International Eugenics Congress as a "Supporting Member" [26]. Was he using his own income as a Thyssen trust banker? Or did the funds come from Dillon Read corporate accounts, perhaps to be written off income tax as "expenses for German project: race purification"? Draper helped select Ernst Rudin as chief of the world eugenics movement, who used his office to promote what he called Adolf Hitler's "holy, national and international racial hygienic mission." [27]
W.S. Farish, as we have seen, was publicly exposed in 1942, humiliated and destroyed. Just before Farish died, Prescott Bush's Nazi banking office was quietly seized and shut down. But Prescott's close friend and partner in the Thyssen-Hitler business, William H. Draper, Jr., neither died nor moved out of German affairs. Draper listed himself as a director of the German Credit and Investment Corp. through 1942, and the firm was not liquidated until November 1943 [28]. But a war was on; Draper, a colonel from previous military service, went off to the Pacific theater and became a general.
General Draper apparently had a hobby: magic--illusions, sleight of hand, etc.--and he was a member of the Society of American Magicians. This is not irrelevant to his subsequent career.
The Nazi regime surrendered in May 1945. In July 1945, General Draper was called to Europe by the American military government authorities in Germany. Draper was appointed head of the Economics Division of the U.S. Control Commission. He was assigned to take apart the Nazi corporate cartels. There is an astonishing but perfectly logical rationale to this -- Draper knew a lot about the subject! General Draper, who had spent about 15 years financing and managing the dirtiest of the Nazi enterprises, was now authorized to decide who was exposed, who lost and who kept his business, and in practical effect, who was prosecuted for war crimes. [29]
(Draper was not unique within the postwar occupation government. Consider the case of John J. McCloy, U.S. Military Governor and High Commissioner of Germany, 1949-1952. Under instructions from his Wall Street law firm, McCloy had lived for a year in Italy, serving as an advisor to the fascist government of Benito Mussolini. An intimate collaborator of the Harriman/Bush bank, McCloy had sat in Adolf Hitler's box at the 1936 Olympic games in Berlin, at the invitation of Nazi chieftains Rudolf Hess and Hermann Goering.) [30]
William H. Draper, Jr., as a "conservative," was paired with the "liberal" U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau in a vicious game. Morgenthau demanded that Germany be utterly destroyed as a nation, that its industry be dismantled and it be reduced to a purely rural country. As the economic boss in 1945 and 1946, Draper "protected" Germany from the Morgenthau Plan ... but at a price.
Draper and his colleagues demanded that Germany and the world accept the collective guilt of the German people as the explanation for the rise of Hitler's New Order, and the Nazi war crimes. This, of course, was rather convenient for General Draper himself, as it was for the Bush family. It is still convenient decades later, allowing Prescott's son, President Bush, to lecture Germany on the danger of Hitlerism. Germans are too slow, it seems, to accept his New World Order.
After several years of government service (often working directly for Averell Harriman in the North Atlantic Alliance), General Draper was appointed in 1958 chairman of a committee which was to advise President Dwight Eisenhower on the proper course for U.S. military aid to other countries. At that time, Prescott Bush was a U.S. Senator from Connecticut, a confidential friend and golf partner with National Security Director Gordon Gray, and an important golf partner with Dwight Eisenhower as well. Prescott's old lawyer from the Nazi days, John Foster Dulles, was Secretary of State, and his brother Allen Dulles, formerly of the Schroder bank, was head of the CIA.
This friendly environment emboldened General Draper to pull off a stunt with his military aid advisory committee. He changed the subject under study. The following year the Draper committee recommended that the U.S. government react to the supposed threat of the "population explosion" by formulating plans to depopulate the poorer countries. The growth of the world's non-white population, he proposed, should be regarded as dangerous to the national security of the United States! [31]
President Eisenhower rejected the recommendation. But in the next decade, General Draper founded the "Population Crisis Committee" and the "Draper Fund", joining with the Rockefeller and Du Pont families to promote eugenics as "population control." The administration of President Lyndon Johnson, advised by General Draper on the subject, began financing birth control in the tropical countries through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
General Draper was George Bush's guru on the population question [32]. But there was also Draper's money--from that uniquely horrible source--and Draper's connections on Wall Street and abroad. Draper's son and heir, William H. Draper III, was co-chairman for finance (chief of fundraising) of the Bush-for-President national campaign organization in 1980. With George Bush in the White House, the younger Draper heads up the depopulation activities of the United Nations throughout the world.
General Draper was vice president of Dillon Read until 1953. During the 1950s and 1960s, the chief executive there was Frederic Brandi, the German who was Draper's co-director for the Nazi investments and his personal contact man with the Nazi German Steel Trust. Nicholas Brady was Brandi's partner from 1954, and replaced him as the firm's chief executive in 1971. Nicholas Brady, who knows where all the bodies are buried, was chairman of his friend George Bush's 1980 election campaign in New Jersey, and has been United States Treasury Secretary throughout Bush's presidency. [33]

There's much more to read and learn about the history of eugenics (remember Hitler's holocaust and the master Aryan race?) and its

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-population-control-holocaust

http://www.meehanreports.com/elite.html

Is "Six-Californias" a Skull and Bones, United Nations, or Council on Foreign Relations Plan?

Let's look at the article in Time magazine about Tim Draper's proposal to break up California:

This week, the California Secretary of State’s office gave initial approval to a proposal that would split the Golden State into six new ones: Jefferson, North California, Silicon Valley, Central California, West California and South California. If proponents can gather 807,000 signatures by July 14, the question will go to voters in November.

The man behind the “Six Californias” plan is big-name venture capitalist Tim Draper, known for investment in companies like Hotmail and Skype. TIME (virtually a Council on Foreign Relations publication) spoke to Draper about where this idea came from, how he decided on six states and whether there are any political ambitions behind his novel effort. Here’s an edited transcript of the interview:

          Where did this idea come from?

We now spend the most and get the least. We spend among the most for education and we’re 46th in education. We spend among the most for prisons, and we are among the highest recidivism rates … So the status quo is failing. And there have been some very good people running California, governing California. So it must be systemic. At best, the system seems to be on a spiral down. At worst it’s a monopoly, and in a monopoly, they can charge whatever they want and provide whatever service they want. In a competitive environment, people get good service and they pay fair prices.

You mentioned all these various desires of people in different areas. Have you spoken to people in each of these six regions who support this plan? 

Yeah. I get a ton of emails of support. People are supporting this all over … What I’ve noticed is that at first, people hear it and they go, ‘Why would you do this? This is California. This is America.’ And then I say, ‘This is exactly why I do this. Because I love California, and I love America.’ We are the government. We the people, are the government. And we need to create a system that works.

Well, that didn't answer the question at all.  Where did the idea really come from?

According to Wikipedia, Tim Draper is son of William Henry Draper III, Draper was born in White Plains, New York, the son of Katherine Louise (née Baum) and banker and diplomat William Henry Draper, Jr.^[1] He attended Yale University with George H. W. Bush, graduated in 1950, the year after George H. W. Bush and is a member of the secret society Skull and Bones.

It goes on to say that in 1959, Draper left Chicago to work as an associate at his father's newly formed firm, Draper, Gaither & Anderson, the first venture capital company on the West Coast.  In 1965, Draper founded Sutter Hill Ventures, which to this day remains one of the top venture capital firms in the country. During his twenty years as the senior partner of Sutter Hill, Draper helped to organize and finance several hundred high technology manufacturing companies. In 1986, he became the head of the world's largest source of multilateral development grant assistance, the United Nations Development Programme, and was instrumental in leadership of several global initiatives, such as the international Education for All movement (beginning formally with the 1990 Conference in Jomtien, Thailand), the 1995 Beijing Women's' Conference, and the 1995 Social Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Draper has played an international leadership role in expanding the world economy (aka a Globalist). He served from 1981 to 1986 as President and Chairman of the Export-Import Bank of the United States and was appointed to this position by President Ronald Reagan. In this post, Draper assumed a leadership role in U.S. efforts to sustain world trade in the face of major liquidity problems among the developing countries.

In 1986, he became the head of the world's largest source of multilateral development grant assistance, the United Nations Development Programme (#UNAgenda21). As the second highest ranking individual in the United Nations, Draper oversaw nearly 10,000 international aid projects. During his time at the UN and the Export-Import Bank, Draper traveled to 101 developing countries and met with over 50 heads of state.^{[citation needed]}As a civic leader, Draper has been involved in many community service programs. He is currently on the boards of the Atlantic Council, The Draper Richards Foundation, Hoover Institution, Freeman Spogli Institute of International Studies at Stanford University, World Affairs Council of Northern California, the United Nations Association of the United States of America and the Harvard Business School California Research Center Advisory Board. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the President’s Council on International Activities at Yale University (#SkullandBones).Draper formerly served as the Chairman of the World Affairs Council of Northern California, Chairman of the Institute of International Education, as a Trustee of Yale University and as Chairman of the Board of the American Conservatory Theater in San Francisco; he was a former Board member of Population Action International, George Bush Library Foundation, the Advisory Council of the Stanford Graduate School of Business, and the World Rehabilitation Fund in New York.

So you see the current state government as a monopoly?Yeah. … The strongest argument for Six Californias is that we are not well-represented. The people down south are very concerned with things like immigration law and the people way up north are frustrated by taxation without representation. And the people in coastal California are frustrated because of water rights. And the people in Silicon Valley are frustrated because the government doesn’t keep up with technology. And in Los Angeles, their issues revolve around copyright law. Each region has its own interest, and I think California is ungovernable because they can’t balance all those interests. I’m looking at Six Californias as a way of giving California a refresh and allowing those states to both cooperate and compete with each other.
...

...How would you like to see things done differently in Silicon Valley, if it had its own government?The issues of Silicon Valley are things like when Napster came out. No one knew how the law should be handled. It was a new technology. And no one quite knew whether it had some violation of copyright or not … And the people who were making those decisions were very distant, and not familiar with what Napster was. Now we have Bitcoin. We have very uncertain laws around Bitcoin. I believe if there were a government closer to Silicon Valley, it would be more in touch with those technologies and the need for making appropriate laws around them. Silicon Valley is seeing great frustration. They see how creative and efficient and exciting life can be in a place where innovation thrives, and then they see a government that is a little lost.
In the state’s legislative analysis, they pointed out that Silicon Valley would become the richest per capita state in the U.S. And another part of California would become the poorest. What about the issue of income inequality this would create among states?The issue is very interesting. For one thing, I’ve noticed that the people most adamant about creating their own state or being a part of their own state are the poorest regions, and in the current system, they are not happy, because it is not working for them. So if they had their own state, I believe all of those states would become wealthier. And I believe by managing their own state, they will become much more successful. A lot of those regions are rural, and they feel they’re being unduly influenced by the urban population.
When you say “we,” who worked on the proposal?I’ve worked with quite a few of these biggest experts in the world in constitutional law, in political thinking, in demographics, in water rights. It’s come after a lot of research and a lot of work.
Can you give an example of someone you’ve worked with?I’ll let them talk for themselves. My goal is to get this put on the ballot and then allow Californians to see what it could do for them.

See, he doesn't answer the question.  If you read any of the articles on the Bay Area Merger, you would learn about others involved in this proposal.  See "Is the Bay Area Merger part of  United Nations Agenda 21?"  Specifically, you learn of the public-private partnerships such as the Joint Venture Silicon Valley.

...Do you have any ambitions to run for elected office, if this proposal becomes a reality or otherwise?Oh, no. Oh, no. I’d let all the states run themselves.
So no plans to be part of the future Silicon Valley state’s government?No, no, no. I just want a good a place to live.

Right.  No official position.  Just operating behind the scenes to be sure he gets what he wants.

This is not a good plan for California!

Read more: Tim Draper on Splitting California Into 6 States | TIME.com 

More on others perspective on the Six-Californias plan

California Breaking Up Into 6 States? - Global Economic Reset Happening

More on the Council on Foreign Relations

Free Trade Liberals and the Globalist New World Order EXPOSED
Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined
Rule from the Shadows - The Psychology of Power
The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline | James Perloff
The Root of Many Evils is Not Money; It is the Council on Foreign Relations
How is the Council on Foreign Relations Involved in G8, G20, and Bilderberg Meetings?
Paul Craig Roberts on the New World Order and the Invisible Empire

More on Agenda 21

AGENDA 21, The United Nations Plan for Global Control
WHO FUNDS UN #AGENDA21/ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT?
How YOUR community is implementing AGENDA 21, The United Nations Plan for Global Control 
How Liberty-Minded Individuals Can Fight UN

Various

Tim Draper's Grandfather Was on the United Nations Population Commission
Atlantic Council Speech: An “extraordinary crisis” is needed to preserve the “new world order,”

Global Economic Reset

California Breaking Up Into 6 States? - Global Economic Reset Happening

@Fabian4Liberty @RosaKoire @tjefferson1976 Check out my post on the #BayAreaMerger, #UNAgenda21, and Breaking Up California into 6 States.
— #SeizeTheFed (@TwistedPolitix) February 23, 2014

Will California Split into 6 States? Why? Cui Bono?

Tweets about "california 6 states"

Power of Drones - Totally Cool Uses for Drones - Trendy BS? Or Sinister Tech?

Air Force Bugbot Nano Drone Technology

The Knightscope K5 - Autonomous Data Machine - Robocop Drone Hits American Streets

Update: 9/30/2014

WTF? @knightscope in #FosterCity streets with #Robocop. I'll pay $100 to the first hacker that hijacks that shit pic.twitter.com/3hUrXOxZ1k
— #OpenYourMind (@TwistedPolitix) October 1, 2014

The local neighborhood watch may be beefing up its robotic arsenal if a new technology startup gets its way anytime soon. In a bid to make local communities safer and give local law enforcement agencies more tools to fight crime, California-based Knightscope recently unveiled a line of K5 robots that it believes will predict and prevent crime with an innovative combination of hardware, software and social engagement. The new K5 units have a look that resembles R2-D2 from Star Wars, but their casual design masks a highly advanced robot that its creators hope will drastically cut down on crime. Weighing in at 300 pounds, the five-foot K5 can patrol a neighborhood and uses a built-in laser to form a 3D map of the surrounding area in 270-degree sweeps. Four built-in cameras, meanwhile, are capable of scanning up to 1,500 license plates a minute.

 

McCain Supports Soros Revolution, Pleads for Ukraine to Join EU

Listen to John Perkins, author of "Confessions of an Economic Hitman".  This is how countries get hoodwinked.

The Truth About The Ukraine Crisis: George Soros is Heavily Involved

Washington Orchestrated Protests Are Destabilizing Ukraine - PaulCraigRoberts.org" ( http://bit.ly/1dcvp6m

Soros gets splattered in Ukraine" ( http://bbc.in/MJNMJA

"International Renaissance Foundation | Open Society Foundations (OSF)" ( http://osf.to/1dcw1sJ

Leading party says Soros prepares “Libyan scenario” for Ukraine — RT Russian politics" ( http://bit.ly/MJNWAL

"George Soros on The End of Ukraine? - Project Syndicate" ( http://bit.ly/1dcwkDN )

"The Struggle for Ukraine – Protests Made in Germany, America and the EU | Global Research" ( http://bit.ly/MJO5nD )

Soros Activists Take Over Ukrainian Government Buildings  http://bit.ly/1dcwCuu

International Renaissance Foundation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" ( http://bit.ly/MJOcjc



From a 2004 article:

    A chief adviser to the Ukrainian prime minister sees uncanny parallels between his boss's campaign for president and last week's U.S. presidential election.
    The Nov. 21 runoff between Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych and Viktor Yushchenko, a former prime minister, is too close to call. Each candidate received about 39 percent in the first round of voting on Oct. 31. Ukrainians appear divided between Mr. Yanukovych's rural supporters and Mr. Yushchenko's urban ones.
    Also, as in the American election, billionaire George Soros, who poured millions of dollars into efforts to defeat President Bush, is also spending millions on the campaign against Mr. Yanukovych, said Eduard Prutnik, the prime minister's adviser, on a visit to The Washington Times yesterday. 
    "It's very much alike. We hope the outcome will also be the same," he said, predicting a victory for Mr. Yanukovych by about five percentage points.
    Iraq is also an issue, with Mr. Yanukovych pledging to keep Ukraine's 1,600 troops within the U.S.-led coalition and Mr. Yushchenko promising to withdraw them within weeks if he is elected.
    One of Mr. Prutnik's goals on his visit to Washington this week is to try to explain why Mr. Yanukovych would be a better U.S. ally than his opponent, who is supported privately by some State Department officials and publicly by many Ukrainians in the United States.
    "Unfortunately, people in this town want to speak in terms of black and white, making one 100 percent positive and the other 100 percent negative," Mr. Prutnik said.
    Critics suspect Mr. Yanukovych of harboring authoritarian tendencies like the current president, Leonid Kuchma, who is supporting the prime minister. They also claim Mr. Yanukovych is too close to Russian President Vladimir Putin and would bring .....
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...\

Ukraine undecided

Free Trade Liberals and the Globalist New World Order EXPOSED

Keep the following article and videos in mind while you learn about the Trans Pacific Partnership (#TPP).  Also, think back to the 1990's: NAFTA and Bill Clinton combined with the introduction of China into the WTO, and the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preface: Liberals might assume that it is Republicans who are cheerleaders for global corporations at the expense of government.  But, as shown below, liberal politicians have been just as bad … or worse.

Matt Stoller – who writes for Salon and has contributed to Politico, Alternet, Salon, The Nation and Reuters – knows his way around Washington.

Stoller – a prominent liberal – has scoured the Congressional Record to unearth hidden historical facts.  For example, Stoller has previously shown that the U.S. government push for a “New World Order” is no wacky conspiracy theory, but extensively documented in the Congressional Record.

Now, Stoller uses the Congressional Record to show that “free trade” pacts were always about weakening nation-states to promote rule by multinationals:

Political officials (liberal ones, actually) engaged in an actual campaign to get rid of countries with their pesky parochial interests, and have the whole world managed by global corporations. Yup, this actually was explicit in the 1960s, as opposed to today’s passive aggressive arguments which amount to the same thing.

***

Liberal internationalists, including people like Chase CEO David Rockefeller and former Undersecretary of State and an architect of 1960s American trade policies George Ball, began pressing for reductions in non-tariff barriers, which they perceived as the next set of trade impediments to pull down. But the idea behind getting rid of these barriers wasn’t about free trade, it was about reorganizing the world so that corporations could manage resources for “the benefit of mankind”. It was a weird utopian vision that you can hear today in the current United States Trade Representative Michael Froman’s speeches. I’ve spoken with Froman about this history, and Froman himself does not seem to know much about it. But he is captive of these ideas, nonetheless, as is much of the elite class. They do not know the original ideology behind what is now just bureaucratic true believer-ism, they just know that free trade is good and right and true.

But back to the 1967 hearing. In the opening statement, before a legion of impressive Senators and Congressmen, Ball attacks the very notion of sovereignty. He goes after the idea that “business decisions” could be “frustrated by a multiplicity of different restrictions by relatively small nation states that are based on parochial considerations,” and lauds the multinational corporation as the most perfect structure devised for the benefit of mankind. He also foreshadows our modern world by suggesting that commercial, monetary, and antitrust policies should just be and will inevitably be handled by supranational organizations. [Background.]

Here’s just some of that statement. It really is worth reading, I’ve bolded the surprising parts.

“For the widespread development of the multinational corporation is one of our major accomplishments in the years since the war, though its meaning and importance have not been generally understood. For the first time in history man has at his command an instrument that enables him to employ resource flexibility to meet the needs of peopels all over the world. Today a corporate management in Detroit or New York or London or Dusseldorf may decide that it can best serve the market of country Z by combining the resources of country X with labor and plan facilities in country Y – and it may alter that decision 6 months from now if changes occur in costs or price or transport. It is the ability to look out over the world and freely survey all possible sources of production… that is enabling man to employ the world’s finite stock of resources with a new degree of efficiency for the benefit of all mandkind.

But to fulfill its full potential the multinational corporation must be able to operate with little regard for national boundaries – or, in other words, for restrictions imposed by individual national governments.

To achieve such a free trading environment we must do far more than merely reduce or eliminate tariffs. We must move in the direction of common fiscal concepts, a common monetary policy, and common ideas of commercial responsibility. Already the economically advanced nations have made some progress in all of these areas through such agencies as the OECD and the committees it has sponsored, the Group of Ten, and the IMF, but we still have a long way to go. In my view, we could steer a faster and more direct course… by agreeing that what we seek at the end of the voyage is the full realization of the benefits of a world economy.

Implied in this, of course, is a considerable erosion of the rigid concepts of national sovereignty, but that erosion is taking place every day as national economies grow increasingly interdependent, and I think it desirable that this process be consciously continued. What I am recommending is nothing so unreal and idealistic as a world government, since I have spent too many years in the guerrilla warfare of practical diplomacy to be bemused by utopian visions. But it seems beyond question that modern business – sustained and reinforced by modern technology – has outgrown the constrictive limits of the antiquated political structures in which most of the world is organized, and that itself is a political fact which cannot be ignored. For the explosion of business beyond national borders will tend to create needs and pressures that can help alter political structures to fit the requirements of modern man far more adequately than the present crazy quilt of small national states. And meanwhile, commercial, monetary, and antitrust policies – and even the domiciliary supervision of earth-straddling corporations – will have to be increasingly entrusted to supranational institutions….

We will never be able to put the world’s resources to use with full efficiency so long as business decisions are frustrated by a multiplicity of different restrictions by relatively small nation states that are based on parochial considerations, reflect no common philosophy, and are keyed to no common goal.” ***

These ["free trade"] agreements are not and never have been about trade. You simply cannot disentangle colonialism, the American effort to create the European Union, and American trade efforts. After their opening statements, Ball and Rockefeller go on on to talk about how European states need to be wedged into a common monetary union with our trade efforts and that Latin America needs to be managed into prosperity by the US and Africa by Europe. Through such efforts, they thought that the US could put together a global economy over the next thirty years. Thirty years later was 1997, which was exactly when NAFTA was being implemented and China was nearing its entry into the WTO. Impeccable predictions, gents.

***

I guess it turns out that the conspiracy theorists who believe in UN-controlled black helicopters aren’t as wrong as you might think about trade policy, and not just because United Technologies, which actually makes black helicopters, has endorsed the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

***

These agreements are about getting rid of national sovereignty, and the people who first pressed for NAFTA were explicit about it. They really did want a global government for corporations.

***

Ball in particular expressed his idea of a government by the corporations, for the corporations, in order to benefit all mankind. Keep that in mind when you think you’re being paranoid.

The full hearing can be downloaded here, though it is a big file.

The bottom line is not that liberals – or conservatives – are evil.

It’s that neither the Democratic or Republican parties reflect the true values of the American people (and see this).

Indeed, a scripted psuedo-war between the parties is often used by the powers-that-be as a way to divide and conquer the American people, so that we are too distracted to stand up to reclaim our power from the idiots in both parties who are only governing for their own profit … and a small handful of their buddies. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.

Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined #NWO

Climate Engineering Weather Warfare, and the Collapse of Civilization #UNAgenda21

British PM @David_Cameron says #chemtrails don't exist + are prohibited by int'l treaty. RT if you don't believe him. pic.twitter.com/OHyMaEzG75
— James Corbett (@corbettreport) April 13, 2014

For more on the #UNAgenda21 series involving climate engineering, hoaxes, solutions, and more see these articles:

10 Climate Myths Busted (in 60 seconds!) 

UN Links Overpopulation to Climate Change, Launch Programs for Depopulation

Does the UN believe overpopulation the cause of climate change?

Sustainable Development, Agenda 21 and Population Control 

Is the Bay Area merger part of United Nations Agenda 21?

Agenda 21 is a Global Austerity Plan Prepared by Bankers

Is Climate Change a Hoax or a Distraction? Man Made or Natural Adjustments

United Nations Formation, Population Control, Eugenics, Rockefeller 

Population Control - Nixon & Rockefeller 1972

Brilliant podcasts (long) from Tragedy and Hope:

Peace Revolution episode 061: Cybernetics, Technocracy, and Agenda 21

Peace Revolution episode 068: From Feudalism to Agenda 21

Peace Revolution episode 066: How Central Bankers Harness and Manipulate Human Resources

Peace Revolution episode 064: The Scientific Racism of Eugenics and Social Darwinism

CIA And Government Destabilisation

The Mena Connection: Bush, Clinton, and CIA Drug Smuggling (1995) Full L...

The CIA and the National Endowment for Democracy

Unite and Conquer: Fighting Back Against the Oligarchy #CommonGround

Once again James Corbett nails it!



Remember this? I still say, and am validated more and more that there is #CommonGround between all the different independents across the country.

See my article entitled "Would a coalition of TeaParty and Occupy Makes Sense?"

The answer is YES! The Proving ground is #TPP

Tweets about "#tpp"

#goodnewsnextweek Independents Outnumber Both Democrats and Republicans in 44 of 50 States http://t.co/gU4Pu4iUGI
— saergant cash (@SaergantC) March 3, 2015

"A Corporate Trojan Horse": Obama Pushes Secretive TPP Trade Pact, Would...

Would-Be Bomber Turns out to be Double Agent

Underwear Bomber Worked for the CIA & Saudi Intelligence

Now this is an interesting story that got a lot of media hype and attention at the time it occurred but not when it was revealed that he worked for the CIA and Saudi Intelligence!



According to The Guardian:

Bomber involved in plot to attack US-bound jet was working as an informer with Saudi intelligence and the CIA, it has emerged.

It goes on to say:

A would-be "underwear bomber" involved in a plot to attack a US-based jet was in fact working as an undercover informer with Saudi intelligence and the CIA, it has emerged.
The revelation is the latest twist in an increasingly bizarre story about the disruption of an apparent attempt by al-Qaida to strike at a high-profile American target using a sophisticated device hidden in the clothing of an attacker.
The plot, which the White House said on Monday had involved the seizing of an underwear bomb by authorities in the Middle East sometime in the last 10 days, had caused alarm throughout the US.
It has also been linked to a suspected US drone strike in Yemen where two Yemeni members of al-Qaida were killed by a missile attack on their car on Sunday, one of them a senior militant, Fahd Mohammed Ahmed al-Quso.
But the news that the individual at the heart of the bomb plot was in fact an informer for US intelligence is likely to raise just as many questions as it answers.

One has to ask, how often does this happen.  (Hint: A lot!)

Tweets about ""underwear bomber""

Say NO to the National Internet Tax Mandate!

Andrew, 

The only thing politicians love more than spending your money is taking more of it. 

Tax-and-spend senators in BOTH parties have already RAMMED through a new taxing scheme that's been years in the works - the National Internet Tax Mandate. 

Should it pass the House, every man, woman, and child in the country will feel the pinch as Congress takes a MASSIVE bite out of American prosperity. 

Campaign for Liberty President John Tate explains below why the National Internet Tax Mandate scheme is so dangerous. 

Please read his email and take action IMMEDIATELY. 

And after you sign your petition, please forward this email to anyone - and everyone - you know. 

For Liberty, 

Ron Paul
Chairman 

---

Andrew,

Harry Reid and big-spending, high-tax statists in BOTH parties have already RAMMED the National Internet Tax Mandate through the Senate. 

And without C4L members' continued action, it could be gaveled through the House and sent to Barack Obama’s desk for his guaranteed signature. 

So it’s absolutely critical you sign the petition I've made up for you DEMANDING Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor KILL the National Internet Tax Mandate in the House. 

I'll give you the link shortly, but first let me explain exactly why this is so important... 

Currently, because of the Founders' vision for our country, states are "laboratories" - free to set their own tax policies. 

High-tax, big-spending, highly regulatory state governments send businesses and citizens alike fleeing across state lines in search of more liberty. 

But under the National Internet Tax Mandate scheme, the statists are setting the stage to bring it all to a crashing halt. 



Under the National Internet Tax Mandate: 

*** All Americans would pay more for the “privilege” of shopping online, as big-spending governors of BOTH parties work with the federal government to implement the Mandate. 

Big-spending governors are running their states into bankruptcy, and - instead of reducing spending - they want Congress to force YOU to bail them out with Internet sales tax revenue! 

*** Tax collectors in one state would now be free to pursue retailers across state lines. 

For example, if a customer in New York makes a purchase from an online retailer in Texas, that retailer MUST collect New York's exorbitant sales taxes and send them to New York's tax collection agencies; 

*** New and higher taxes would CRUSH economic growth and set the stage for massive new regulations that threaten the very existence of the Internet. 

Make no mistake. 

This is all bad enough on its face. 

But it's hardly the end of it. 

You and I both know, under the guise of "national security," establishment bureaucrats are already feverishly looking for new ways to trace, track, and register all Americans' online activity. 

What you read. What you buy. What videos you watch. What you write about THEM. 

Now the one-world socialists at the United Nations want in on the action, as well. 



In fact, the U.N. has already drafted a new "Telecommunications Treaty" to impose restrictive regulations, global CENSORSHIP, and a massive new tax on all Internet operations. 

If ratified by the United States Senate, the United Nations' Treaty could give control of the Internet to U.N. bureaucrats. 

Ultimately, the U.N. hopes to use this scheme to take a tax bite out of the TRILLIONS of dollars exchanging hands via Internet commerce - money that will make the U.N. a true world government. 

And this National Internet Tax Mandate is playing right into their hands. 

That's why it's so critical you sign your No Internet Tax petition and make your most generous contribution of $100, $50, or $35 to C4L IMMEDIATELY. 

Even if you can only chip in $20 or $10, it will make a tremendous difference. 

Just like the Wall Street bailouts and the "deal" over the debt ceiling during the so-called "government shutdown," this National Internet Tax Mandate is "bipartisan" to its core. 

And statists in BOTH parties are determined to RAM this scheme into law. 

Governors from all over the country who literally CANNOT wait to get more tax money are busy bending the ears of Congress. 



And with big spenders in BOTH parties lining up in support of increasing government control over the Internet, I’m afraid this legislation - or some sort of so-called "compromise" - could make it through the House unless you act today. 

Will you stand by while the big taxers grab yet more tax dollars from hardworking Americans? 

Do you simply shrug your shoulders at the thought of United Nations global socialists shutting down the free flow of information worldwide? 

Or will you help me FIGHT BACK? 

Please take a moment to sign your petition DEMANDING Bob Goodlatte, Eric Cantor, and John Boehner kill the National Internet Tax IMMEDIATELY. 

And if you can, please make your most generous contribution to C4L TODAY. 

Your generosity will help me alert hundreds of thousands of Americans to this critical fight and stop the National Internet Tax Mandate. 

C4L will use mail, email, and hard-hitting Internet ads - and even newspaper, radio, and TV ads, if necessary. 

And with the fight going on right now, this won't be cheap. 

But it will be what it takes to win. 

During the Senate fight over the National Internet Tax Mandate, Campaign for Liberty generated phone calls and thousands of petitions in opposition to taxing the Internet. 

When the fight began, the statists thought they could ram their bill through the Senate with as many as 90 votes. 

Capitol Hill insiders have told me and my staff that Campaign for Liberty's efforts were the key to changing the minds of many senators and making sure the bill passed in the Senate with far fewer votes than expected - greatly helping stall the bill's momentum. 

If you and I can generate this type of massive pressure on the U.S. House, I'm confident we can DEFEAT the statists' attempt to get more of your money through the Internet. 

So in addition to signing your petition, won't you please agree to your most generous contribution of $100, $50, or $35 IMMEDIATELY? 

Even if all you can do is chip in $10 or $20 to this fight, please do so right away. 

There's no time to waste. 

In Liberty,

John Tate
President