Thursday, March 5, 2015
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
Obama - Netanyahu Row Over Speech to Congress Is Theater, Was Planned in 2009
From RadioFreeBlood
This Dog and Pony show will also help to insure that JEB and the GOP get the uninitiated Jewish vote in 2016 (as planned)
US and Israel attempting to establish feigned “diplomatic row” to justify “unilateral” Israeli attack on Iran.
March 2, 2015 (Tony Cartalucci – LD) – In a 2009 US policy paper published by the corporate-financier funded Brookings Institution, it was made clear that the US was determined to provoke Iran into a conflict and effect regime change at any cost – up to and including an outright military invasion and occupation of Iran with US troops.
However, before it came to that, the Brookings Institution’s policymakers explored other options including fomenting US-backed political unrest coupled with covert, violent force, the use of US State Department listed foreign terrorist organizations to carry out assassinations and attacks within Iran, and limited airstrikes carried out by either the US or Israel, or both.
In retropspect, 6 years on, all of these tricks have not only been attempted to one degree or another in Iran, but have been demonstrably employed in neighboring Syria to diminish its strength – which according to Brookings – is a necessary prerequisite before waging war on Iran.
And of particular interest – considering what appears to be a growing diplomatic row between the United States and Israel – is just how precisely the US planned to covertly back what would be made to appear as a “unilateral” Israeli first strike on Iran – an attack that appears to be in the process of being justified through a carefully orchestrated propaganda campaign now unfolding.
From the Mouths of US Policymakers Themselves
The Brookings Institution’s 2009 policy paper titled, “Which Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy Toward Iran,” makes clear that negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program is merely theater, and that it will be used to give the world the impression that the United States explored all possible “peaceful” options before resorting to violent regime change. The report states specifically that:
…any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context— both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal.
Of course, Iran – as admitted to by Brookings themselves – is not governed by irrational leadership, and would not turn down a genuinely “superb offer.” The Brookings Institution admits openly that the US pursues a dual track foreign policy – one for public consumption (making “superb offers”) and another aimed at ensuring Iran looks as unreasonable as possible.
The truth is that these all would be challenging cases to make. For that reason, it would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be. Of course, it would be very difficult for the United States to goad Iran into such a provocation without the rest of the world recognizing this game, which would then undermine it. (One method that would have some possibility of success would be to ratchet up covert regime change efforts in the hope that Tehran would retaliate overtly, or even semi-overtly, which could then be portrayed as an unprovoked act of Iranian aggression.)
Here, Brookings policymakers openly conspire to undermine global peace by “goading” another nation into a war it neither wants nor will benefit from. Provoking a nation that poses no threat to the national security of the United States is a clear violation of international law – with the Brookings paper serving as a literal signed confession.
Yet despite this open admission, conspiring against world peace, what is of more interest is the United States’ plans to disavow any responsibility for an attack it would use its regional proxy, Israel, to carry out in its place. It states specifically under a chapter titled, “Allowing or Encouraging an Israeli Military Strike,” that:
…the most salient advantage this option has over that of an American air campaign is the possibility that Israel alone would be blamed for the attack. If this proves true, then the United States might not have to deal with Iranian retaliation or the diplomatic backlash that would accompany an American military operation against Iran. It could allow Washington to have its cake (delay Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear weapon) and eat it, too (avoid undermining many other U.S. regional diplomatic initiatives).
To no one’s surprise the British Daily Mail now reports in an article titled, “President Obama threatened to shoot down Israeli jets if they attacked Iranian nuclear facilities last year, claim sources,” that:
President Obama is alleged to have stopped an Israeli military attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets, according to reports to emerge from the Middle East at the weekend
The threat from the U.S. forced Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to abort a planned attack on Iraq, reported Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Jarida.
Netanyahu will be in Washington for an address to Congress on Tuesday aimed squarely at derailing Obama’s cherished bid for a diplomatic deal with Tehran.
Here, the Daily Mail repeats a growing narrative that dovetails neatly into long-standing US foreign policy described by the Brookings Institution’s report in 2009 – down to the letter. In fact, the prospect of “shooting down” Israeli planes was discussed as one of many props used in this geopolitical theater.
The US, as prescribed by Brookings, is portrayed as desperately trying to hammer out an almost unreasonably accommodation with Iran, while “mad dog” Israel seeks to unilaterally attack Iran – thus giving the US the plausible deniability it openly claimed it would disingenuously attempt to create ahead of any Israeli attack on Iran. It should be noted that the summation of Israel’s military might is a result long, extensive, and continuous US military support meaning that Israeli military operation is even possible without it.
Also of interest is Israel’s habitual, belligerent, serial acts of inhumanity against both its own people and the Palestinians whose land Tel Aviv has seized and continues to occupy. The nature of these acts is not one of self-preservation, but of intentional provocation – creating predictable political divides across the West easily manipulated particularly at times like these where a “regrettable” attack made upon Iran, a nation the West has thus far failed to topple with terrorism, US-backed sedition, sanctions, and covert provocations, is now in the cards.
It is also clear that the 2009 “Which Path to Persia?” policy paper still represents a vivid window into a much deeper and well-entrenched doctrine still to this day being used to reorder the Middle East into alignment with Western special interests. It is a signed confession of a now evident conspiracy against global peace and stability. It should be read, in full, before the United Nations Security Council before those who wrote it and the corporate-financier interests who sponsored it are brought to international justice.
Anything less proves that the United States and its regional proxies, not Iran, are the rogue states, working against global peace and stability, with many standing examples already of their atrocities on display, and more – apparently – still to come.
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
The Real Ruler of Israel: Sheldon Adelson
by URI AVNERY for Counterpunch
Who is the ruler of Israel?
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, of course.
WRONG.
The real ruler of Israel is one Sheldon Adelson, 81, American Jew, Casino king, who was rated as the world’s tenth richest person, worth 37.2 billion dollars at the latest count. But who is counting?
Besides his casinos in Las Vegas, Pennsylvania, Macao and Singapore, he owns the US Republican party and, lately, both Houses of the US Congress.
He also owns Binyamin Netanyahu.
Adelson’s connection with Israel is personal. On a blind date, he fell in love with an Israeli woman.
Miriam Farbstein was born in Haifa, attended a prestigious high school, did her army service in the Israeli institute which deals with bacteriological warfare and is a multifaceted scientist. After one of her sons (from her first marriage) died of an overdose, she is devoted to the fight against drugs, especially cannabis.
Both Adelsons are fanatical supporters of Israel. Not just any Israel, but a rightist, supremacist, arrogant, violent, expansionist, annexationist, non-compromising, colonialist Israel.
In “Bibi” Netanyahu they found their man. Through Netanyahu they hope to rule Israel as their private fief.
To assure this, they did an extraordinary thing: they founded an Israeli newspaper, solely devoted to the furthering of the interests of Binyamin Netanyahu. Not of the Likud, not of a specific policy, but of Netanyahu personally.
Years ago I invented a Hebrew word for papers which are distributed for nothing. “Hinamon” translates, roughly, into “ragratis” or “gratissue” and was intended to denigrate. But I did not dream of a monster like “Israel Hayom” (“Israel Today”) – a paper with unlimited funds, distributed every day for nothing in the streets and malls all over the country by hundreds, perhaps thousands of paid young persons.
Israelis love getting something for nothing. Israel Hayom is now the daily paper with the widest distribution in Israel. It drains readers and advertising revenue from its only competitor – Yedioth Ahronoth (“Latest News”), which held this title until then.
Yedioth reacted furiously. It became a ferocious enemy of Netanyahu. Yossi Werter, a commentator of the center-left Haaretz (which has a far lower circulation) even believes that the present election boils down to a contest between the two papers.
That is vastly exaggerated. Judged by political and social content, there is little to differentiate the two. Both are super-patriotic, war-mongering and rightist. That is the journalistic recipe for attracting the masses anywhere in the world.
Yedioth is owned by the Moses family, a business-minded clan. The present, third-generation publisher is Arnon (“Noni”) Moses, the publicity-shy boss of a large economic empire based on the paper. The paper serves his business interests, but he has no special political interests.
Adelson is unique.
In Israel, betting is forbidden by law. We have no casinos, and secret gambling dens are raided by the police. In our early youth we were taught that casino moguls are bad people, almost like arms merchants. They take the money off poor addicted people, throwing them into despair, even suicide. See Dostoyevsky.
Israelis read Israel Hayom (it’s something for nothing, after all), but they don’t necessarily like the man and his methods. So some members of the Knesset were encouraged to enter a bill forbidding gratis newspapers altogether.
Netanyahu and the Likud party did everything to obstruct this bill. But in the preliminary vote (necessary for private members’ bills) they were beaten in an amazing way. Even members of Netanyahu’s governing coalition voted for it. The cameras caught Netanyahu literally running in the Knesset plenum hall to gain his seat before the voting started.
The vote was 43 to 23. Almost half the Likud members absented themselves. Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and his party voted for the bill. So did ministers Ya’ir Lapid and Tzipi Livni.
From the preliminary vote to the final adoption, such a bill has to pass several stages. There was plenty of time to bury it in one of the committees. But Netanyahu was furious. A few days after the vote, he dismissed Lapid and Livni from the cabinet, causing the government coalition to break up and the Knesset to disperse.
Why did Netanyahu do such a foolish thing less then half way through his (third) term of office? There can be only one logical explanation: he was ordered to do so by Adelson, in order to prevent the adoption of the law.
If so, Adelson is now our chief lawmaker. Perhaps he is also our chief government-maker.
Money plays an ever-increasing role in politics. Election propaganda is made on television, which is very expensive. Both in Israel and the US, legal and illegal funds pour into the campaign, directly and indirectly. Corruption is abetted or tolerated by the courts. The very rich (known euphemistically in America as the “wealthy”) exercise undue influence.
In the last US presidential elections, Adelson poured rivers of dollars into the contest. He supported Newt Gingrich, and then Mitt Romney, with huge sums of money. In vain. Perhaps Americans don’t like to be ruled by captains of casinos.
For the next US presidential elections, Adelson has started early. He has summoned to his Las Vegas casino HQ all leading Republican candidates, to grill them on their allegiance to him – and to Netanyahu. Nobody dared to refuse the summons. Would a Roman senator refuse the summons of Caesar?
In Israel, such rituals are superfluous. The Adelsons – both Miri and Sheldon – know who their man is.
The Israel Hayom newspaper is, of course, a big propaganda machine, totally devoted to the re-election of Netanyahu. All quite legal. In a democracy, who can tell a newspaper whom to support? We are still a democracy, for God’s sake!
It seems to be strange for a country to allow a foreigner, who never lived in the country, to have such enormous power over its future, indeed, over its very existence.
That’s where Zionism comes in. According to the Zionist creed, Israel is the state of the Jews, all the Jews. Every Jew in the world belongs to Israel, even if temporarily residing somewhere else. A few days ago, Netanyahu publicly claimed to represent not just the State of Israel but also the entire “Jewish People”. No need to ask them.
Accordingly, Adelson is not really a foreigner. He is one of us. True, he cannot vote in Israel, though his wife probably can. But many people, including himself, believe that he, being a Jew, has a perfect right to interfere in our affairs and dominate our lives.
For example, the appointment of our ambassador in the US. Ron Dermer is an American, born in Miami, who was active in Republican politics. To appoint an American functionary of the Republican Party as ambassador of Israel to a Democratic administration may seem strange. Not so strange if Netanyahu acted under the orders of Sheldon Adelson.
It was Adelson who prepared the witches’ brew that is now endangering Israel’s lifeline to Washington. His stooge, Dermer, induced the Republicans in Congress – all of them dependent on Adelson’s largesse or hoping to be so – to invite Netanyahu to give an anti-Obama speech before both Houses.
While this intrigue was in preparation, Dermer met with John Kerry but did not tell him of Netanyahu’s coming. Neither did Netanyahu inform President Obama, who, in a fury, announced that he would not meet with the Prime Minister.
From the point of view of Israel’s vital interests, it is sheer madness to provoke the President of the United States of America, who controls American’s flow of arms to Israel and the American veto power in the UN. But from the point of view of Adelson, who wants to elect a Republican president in 2016, it makes sense. He has already threatened to invest unlimited sums of money to prevent the reelection of any Senator or Representative who is absent from Netanyahu’s speech.
We are nearing open warfare between the Government of Israel and the President of the United States.
Is someone playing roulette with our future?
URI AVNERY is an Israeli writer and peace activist with Gush Shalom. He is a contributor to CounterPunch’s book The Politics of Anti-Semitism.
Monday, March 2, 2015
#DoubleCross or #RandomCoincidence? Netanyahu Kerry Deal
#DoubleCross "Benjamin Netanyahu to speak on Iran before Congress, while John Kerry sorts out nuke deal overseas http://twitthat.com/YaMLT
#DoubleCross "Benjamin Netanyahu to speak on Iran before Congress, while John Kerry sorts out nuke deal overseas http://t.co/sdHYh3qx3F
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) March 3, 2015
Truth in Media: Origin of ISIS
BREAKING!!! MOST IMPORTANT STORY of 21st Century! #30yrWar #OriginofISIS: http://t.co/sLhwaMRMJF pic.twitter.com/7i7X5jgwnu
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) March 2, 2015
This came out a long time ago and has over 1 million views.
#NetNeutrality #UkraineCrisis #Ferguson Protests were driven by a #BillionaireAgenda #Soros
Just so you know who is funding what: George Soros is EVERYWHERE! and Americans are DUPED by these so-called grassroots campaigns
#NetNeutrality decision was driven by a #BillionaireAgenda #Soros #OSI http://t.co/okfdvt4ano #TechnocracyRising pic.twitter.com/NCQOxKwZpf
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) March 1, 2015
#6Min George Soros Funded #Ferguson Demonstrations. #FreePress? #WeveBeenDuped http://t.co/olBxWP2Zdh pic.twitter.com/uQtiJE44i4
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) January 18, 2015
King George Soros Admits to Funding the Civil War in Ukraine, Becomes Its Central Banker http://t.co/UHNvqtcbNR pic.twitter.com/DKnNoCxNeo
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) December 29, 2014
MUST SEE: The Truthseeker: NGO documents plan Ukraine war (E35) #USAID #NED #Soros #BillionaireAgenda http://t.co/Dh8BFGm3e9
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) March 10, 2014
Bretton Woods II and George Soros | The 4th Media - http://t.co/e8sunn2Hqc #rothschild #gold #imf #sdr pic.twitter.com/5PNAhb4IY2
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) June 22, 2014
I added a video to a @YouTube playlist http://t.co/LaSF0j3ug6 FTA - The Corbett Report 113 - Meet George Soros
— #TechnocracyRising (@TwistedPolitix) March 27, 2014Sunday, March 1, 2015
Peace Revolution episode 087: Privacy & Surveillance / The Future of Freedom vs. The Architecture of Oppression
http://renaissance.libsyn.com/peace-revolution-episode-087-privacy-surveillance-the-future-of-freedom-vs-the-architecture-of-oppression
Peace Revolution episode 087: Privacy & Surveillance / The Future of Freedom vs. The Architecture of Oppression
http://renaissance.libsyn.com/peace-revolution-episode-087-privacy-surveillance-the-future-of-freedom-vs-the-architecture-of-oppression
Friday, February 27, 2015
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Privacy & Surveillance- Future of Freedom v The Architecture of Oppression
Peace Revolution 87 Privacy & Surveillance- Future of Freedom v The Architecture of Oppression http://t.co/lYKWBDCbHl pic.twitter.com/2QYutC3gOG
— Richard Grove (@tragedyandhope) February 25, 2015
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
Solving 9-11: Exposing the Deception
A explanation of how the public has been deceived and misinformed about
the events of 9-11 and how this deception has been used to wage war and
change American society.
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
The Endgame of Technocracy: Scientific Dictatorship
When I was a young financial analyst in 1978, I met Antony Sutton at a gold conference in New Orleans. It took us about 30 minutes of discussion to realize that the Trilateral Commission was in process of hijacking the entire Administration of newly elected president, James Earl Carter.
Founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Commission openly and repeatedly stated that it wanted to create a "New International Economic Order."
Neither Sutton nor I picked up on the thought that the big hijack was not really a political coup, but rather an economic one. It's just that they needed the help of the Executive Branch of our government to pull it off.
As a result, they have maintained a hammerlock hold on the entire trade and economic policy machine that has driven the world into a seemingly broken international system of finance and economic development. Broken is an understatement: Perhaps "spiraling out of control" is a better description.
But, there is another side to the story that is much darker, presenting a clear and present danger to our Republic. That is, Technocracy.
It is plainly evident today, with 40 years of historical examination behind it, that the "New International Economic Order" was really "new" and envisioned historic Technocracy as replacing Capitalism altogether. Technocracy was based on energy rather than money and its system of supply and demand that regulates pricing.
Some distinctives of Technocracy include:
• Elimination of private property and wealth accumulation
• Replacing traditional education with workforce training
• Micromanaging all energy distribution and consumption
• Driving people to live in a limited number of cities and off of rural land
• Enforcing a balance between nature's resources and man's consumption of them.
• Replacing traditional education with workforce training
• Micromanaging all energy distribution and consumption
• Driving people to live in a limited number of cities and off of rural land
• Enforcing a balance between nature's resources and man's consumption of them.
Are you thinking that this list is vaguely familiar? You should because it represents the modern manifestation of programs like Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, Smart Grid, Cap And Trade, Climate Change, Common Core, massive surveillance operations and a whole lot more. All of this has been brought to us by the machinations of the Trilateral Commission and its members since 1973, and it is all part of its master plan to completely replace capitalism with Technocracy. This is their "New International Economic Order"!
What does Smart Grid have to do with Common Core? They are both elements of Technocracy. What does Sustainable Development have in common with Smart Growth? Technocracy. Climate change and total surveillance? You guessed it.
It is all part of the same economic coup started in 1973 and if left unchallenged, it is going to deliver us straight into a Scientific Dictatorship from which we will not be able to recover.
If I am even remotely correct in my analysis, then we had better figure out who the real enemy of the American Republic is.
Ignorance is not the enemy; Ignorance merely hides the enemy and his agenda, but it can be quickly remedied with sufficient illumination and knowledge.
Politicians are not the enemy, whether liberal or conservative. Technocrats hate politicians because they are incapable of running a technological society, but they use politicians whenever it can advance their agenda.
The government itself is not the enemy, but technocrats control certain parts of the machinery of government in order to implement their Technocracy agenda.
In fact, the enemy is Technocracy. Technocrats are human, embedded, entrenched, single-minded, amoral, highly trained, hardened, with unlimited funding. They are master strategists, master propagandists, fully networked and maintain a constant cover-up of their actions. They have worked their way into the fabric of our society from the highest levels of the Executive Branch down to the lowest levels of local government.
The hard-core technocrats in government have virtually neutered every elected body in our nation, from Congress down to state legislatures. Even when Congress passes legislation that gives direct marching orders to Obama and his Administration, they are simply ignored. When Obama wants his own action without going through Congress, he simply creates Executive Orders, Memorandums or Signing Statements.
To be fair to Obama, he is not a technocrat, but only a puppet thereof. All of the Technocracy puppet-masters are lurking and executing behind the scenes.
Take Trilateral Commission member John Podesta for instance. Podesta is Senior Policy Advisor to Obama for Climate Change. In the 1990s under Clinton, Podesta invented and perfected the policy of ruling by Executive Orders, and now he is coaching Obama. Just before he took this position last year, Podesta had just finished up working with a high-level climate-change planning group at the United Nations that called for global reforms and renewed initiatives.
Even the New York Times acknowledges, "the architect of Mr. Obama's climate change plan is none other than his senior counselor, John D. Podesta." The same NYT article also quoted Speaker of the House John Boehner as saying, "This announcement is yet another sign that the president intends to double-down on his job-crushing policies no matter how devastating the impact for America's heartland and the country as a whole."
All complaining and whining aside, Congress remains completely impotent to stop or even slow either Podesta or his prodégé Obama. This is how Technocracy works: In the name of (false) science, they tell you what to do and you do it.
Please be clear on this – people like John Podesta are not socialists, Marxists, communists or fascists. They are Technocrats who are bent on imposing Technocracy that will ultimately destroy capitalism and install themselves as the unelected and unaccountable leaders of the New International Economic Order.
It's a Scientific Dictatorship.
For those who think this is all too inconceivable, consider what Christiana Figueres stated on February 3, 2015:
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution…That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation.” [Emphasis added]
Figueres is the Executive Secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, and is the undisputed global driver for implementing climate-change policies and Sustainable Development.
Finish reading the article here.
Monday, February 23, 2015
ALL Islamic Terrorism Funded By British Crown
Divide and conquer has been the primary modus operandi of the global elite for centuries. In 1947 the British carved Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan at the time) out of India with the intention of forever dividing the Hindus and Muslims of South Asia. Ghandi was jailed for “interfering with the revenue” when he criticized the East India Company for its opium trafficking habit.
The British Crown established the Aga Khan Foundation in Pakistan to fund its covert operations in the region. Prince Shah Karim Al Hussaini Aga Khan IV claims direct descent from the prophet Mohammed, just as the Illuminati bankers claim lineage to Jesus Christ. According to Forbes, he is one of the ten richest “royals” in the world with a fortune of over $800 million.
Born in Switzerland and a British citizen, he now resides in France, where he breeds race horses. He owns an entire island in the Bahamas, an exclusive yacht club in Sardinia where he parks his $150 million yacht, two Bombardier jets, and several estates around the world. In 2008 French President Nicolas Sarkozy exempted Aga Khan from all taxes, saving the British agent billions of dollars. In late February 2014 he became the first faith-based leader to address a joint session of Canada’s Zionist-controlled parliament.
The Aga Khan Foundation’s primary purpose is to aid and abet the global oligarchy of which he is very much a part. It specializes in spawning various types of Muslim extremists from mujahadeen to al Qaeda to Wahhabis to Takfiris to the al Nusra Front. All represent a right-wing medieval ideology collectively known as political Islam. They are deployed to attack nationalist and left-wing governments who refuse to be cowed by the Rothschild bankers and their corporate tentacles.
As major component of this strategy is that these extremist groups create a general hatred of Muslims in the Western world. Divide and conquer.
Aga Khan Foundation is a subsidiary of Crown Corporation, the umbrella under which many assets of the British Crown fall. This is the same Crown Corporation which owned Securacom, the private firm chaired by Marvin Bush which held the security contract on the World Trade Center in September 2001.
Starting to get the picture?
Every Islamic terrorist organization, without exception, is created by this Aga Khan/Muslim Brotherhood/Freemason/MI6 intelligence network to carry out the agenda of the global Sangreal bloodline oligarchy.
They were deployed to overthrow the Sukarno government in Indonesia in 1964, to defeat the leftist Tudeh Party in Iran in 1978, to overthrow leftist Prime Minister Nor Mohammed Taraki in Afghanistan in 1979, to attack Qaddafi’s Libyan progressive state from Exxon Mobil-controlled Chad and to harass Assad’s nationalist Syria for the past three decades.
The most recent incarnations of Crown-controlled terrorists include ISIS and Boko Haram. What follows is an excellent expose on the latter:
Boko Haram is CIA Covert Op
By Julie Lévesque Global Research, February 14, 2015
The objectives of the US military presence in Africa are well documented: counter Chinese influence and control strategic locations and natural resources including oil reserves. This was confirmed more than 8 years ago by the US State Department:
In 2007, US State Department advisor Dr. J. Peter Pham commented on AFRICOM’s strategic objectives of “protecting access to hydrocarbons and other strategic resources which Africa has in abundance, a task which includes ensuring against the vulnerability of those natural riches and ensuring that no other interested third parties, such as China, India, Japan, or Russia, obtain monopolies or preferential treatment.” (Nile Bowie, CIA Covert Ops in Nigeria: Fertile Ground for US Sponsored Balkanization Global Research, 11 April 2012)
Read more at: http://stop-imperialism.com/2015/02/16/6052/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)