Wednesday, November 14, 2012

The First Oder of Business for Congress After the Election

So whatever Congress does after this past election wil be telling.  They haven't agreed on much since the days of Thomas Jefferson but what I can tell you is that what happens right after the election and just before Christmas break affects every single human on this planet in one way or another.




House approves natural-gas pipeline off NYC coast

By Pete Kasperowicz 11/14/12 01:17 PM ET
The House passed legislation Wednesday that will allow the construction of a natural-gas pipeline off the coast of New York City, which will supply gas to Brooklyn and Queens.

The bill was seen as necessary because while the National Park Service supports the pipeline, it was not authorized to approve it.
The New York City Natural Gas Supply Enhancement Act, H.R. 2606, was proposed by Rep. Michael Grimm (R-N.Y.), and had already been approved by the House. The Senate approved it with non-controversial amendments, and the House passed that Senate version by voice vote.
Grimm's bill was one of four suspension bills the House approved in a short work session on Wednesday. Others were:

• H.R. 6570, to amend U.S. law to require less frequent, annual reports on stimulus spending and the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP);  (so the bailout is transparent to everyone, right?)

• H.R. 6116, allowing decisions by the Supreme Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court; and (so that offshore entities and their losses can be bailed out)

• H.R. 5934, applying U.S. laws against contraband tobacco products in the U.S. territories. (opening lucrative black markets for insiders)

Members also debated H.R. 2453, a bill authorizing a Mark Twain commemorative coin, but will vote on this later in the week.
These bills were the only legislation considered on Wednesday, and after passage, the House moved to special order speeches.

Google Search Result on Ron Paul Farewell to Congress Testament to Popularity

12,000,000 sites post Ron Paul's Farewell to Congress Speech and yet he couldn't get into the 2012 presidential debate.  We should boycott, strike, and protest!  Some high cabal is controlling what we see and hear from Hollywood to Washington DC and they refuse to let us hear what Ron Paul has to say.  Why do they fear his words? his message? Would we ignore their propaganda? Based on my understanding of REAL Americans is that we do not tolerate control by a foreign power operating with domestic agents!


Ron Paul's Farewell To Congress, The Big Awakening

From the ever great Zerohedge.


Representative Ron Paul gets his opportunity to say farewell - providing a compendium of reality and liberty for all that choose to listen.. He begins: "My goals in 1976 were the same as they are today: to promote peace and prosperity by a strict adherence to the principles of individual liberty" and goes on..."economic ignorance is common place, as the failed policies of Keynesianism are continually promoted"... "psychopathic totalitarians endorse government initiatives to change our world" - live webcast
click image for live stream...

To watch the entire speech - forward to 2:08:49 in this clip (no embed so click on image):

How Does Sandy Impact the Occupy and TeaParty?

How bad was it to live through Sandy? I heard it was not so bad for those with money and electric power.  For those that lost power, was it all that bad? What caused the troubles you face? A bad storm or bad preparation? Did insurance companies take care of you better than governments?  Did oil companies deliver enough fuel in time? Too bad we don't have insurance that covers economic wars because it impacts our social well being and can even lead to a life or death situation.

Comment on this article to share your experiences.  Then wonder around this site to see if anything peaks your experience.

Saturday, November 10, 2012

@RonPaul: If we #auditthefed what questions will we ask?

@RonPaul: If we #auditthefed what questions will we ask?

The one thing I would like to know is this.

What is the profit on lending money out of thin air? Could that rate of interest be considered usury under the laws of 1776, 1864, 1929, or 2008?

Certainly they can tell you, and if they cant, that is exactly what we should report to the world.  A timeline of every transaction the Federal Reserve has made for the past 100 years.  The only way you are going to see a pattern and determine if anything underhanded has gone on in the past.  This will also tell us moving forward if there is any correlation to any other global socioeconomic activity.

This would be the trial of the century and could change the world.  More than during the trust busting years, more than during the latest wikileaks revelation.

So Dr. Paul, can you tell me whether or not you think industrial hemp could be a good standard for the money supply? Or does it need to be gold and silver? Wouldn't a source of food, energy, and plastics be a good monetary standard?

All the best,

@Twistedpolitix

@stacyherbert: What if hemp seed was money? Battling the Federal Reserve

I read the passage below and got to thinking.


By1698 the national debt expanded from £1,250,000 to £16,000,000 and up went the taxes the debt was secured on.
As hard as it might be to believe, in times of economic upheaval, wealth is rarely destroyed and instead is often only transferred. And who benefits the most when money is scarce? You may have guessed. It’s those controlling what everyone else wants, the money changer’s.  Read more...
What if the standard commodity backing the supply of money was hemp seed?  If we had to chose between eating it or selling it, we could.  It would be the first economic model based on a source of energy, a source of fuel, a source of food, a source of nutrition, and a source for high tech plastics for building planes, trains, automobiles, and houses.  
Would this not provide some Americans an opportunity to leave the city and most out to the countryside where they can breath fresh air and live with nature? 
Would this not generate the needed economic activity to increase employment? 
If employment increased, we could pay off our debt to the British Monarchy, OPEC, China, Japan, and every other sovereign nation and super corporation.  If we don't pay that debt, we will cause the next World War.  This global economic boom and bust crap has got to end and taking charge of own money supply and well being will be the only thing that saves us all from that apocalypse.

I would love to hear your thoughts Stacy, Max as well.  I want to run it by Lauren Lyster, James G Rickards, Ron Paul, H Lovins of Natural Capitalist Solutions, and Richard Grove of Tragedy and Hope Magazine.  Maybe get Gerald Celente in there, some economists, oh wait, you've already done that.  Thanks to all of these folks for sharing.

Regards,

TwistedPolitix.

PS: Americans, if you don't believe that can happen in the United States, that a banking conspiracy has brought us to our knees, then you should watch the Keiser Report, read more from Ed Griffin, and listen to the peace revolution podcast. (RSS here too.)



@tragedyandhope: What company offered to drain the Red Sea for Egyptian gold lost at time of Moses?





//
you're reading...
BARACK OBAMABRITAINCURRENCYDEBTECONOMYEUROPEFEDERAL RESERVEGOLDMAN SACHSGOVERNMENTHISTORYNEWS WORLDOBAMA,POLITICALPOLITICSPROPAGANDAROCKEFELLERROTHSCHILDSOROSSUBVERSIONTAXESTEA PARTYTREASONUNITED STATESVIOLENCE

Rothschild Banking & British Monarchy, With Blood On Their Hands : United States At War With The British Monarchy!

THE HISTORY OF MONEY PART 1
Let’s Go FORWARD
Tell someone you are going to a convention of accountants and you might get a few yawns, yet money and how it works is probably one of the most interesting things on earth.
It is fascinating and almost magical how money appeared on our planet. Unlike most developments we enjoy, which can be traced back to a source, civilisation or inventor, money appeared in places then unconnected all over the world in a remarkably simular way.
Consider the American Indians using WampumWest Africans trading in decorative metallic objects called Manillas and theFijians economy based on whales teeth, some of which are still legal tender; add to that shells, amber, ivory, decorative feathers, cattle including oxen & pigs, a large number of stones including jade and quartz which have all been used for trade across the world, and we get a taste of the variety of accepted currency.
  1. THE PRESIDENTS WHO KILLED ROTHSCHILD BANKING SCHEMES : ROOSEVELT AND THE PRESIDENTS MURDERED BY ROTHSCHILD ~ LINCOLN & KENNEDY!
There is something charming and childlike imagining primitive societies, our ancestors, using all these colourful forms of money. As long as everyone concerned can agree on a value, this is a sensible thing for a community to do.
After all, the person who has what you need might not need what you have to trade. Money solves that problem neatly. Real value with each exchange, and everyone gaining from the convenience. The idea is really inspired which might explain why so many diverse minds came up with it.
BUT ALL IS NOT WELL
“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.”
Money, money, money, it’s always just been there, right? Wrong.
Obviously it’s issued by the government to make it easy for us to exchange things. Wrong again!
Truth is most people don’t realise that the issuing of money is essentially a private business, and that the privilege of issuing money has been a major bone of contention throughout history.
Wars have been fought and depressions have been caused in the battle over who issues the money; however the majority of us are not aware of this, and this is largely due to the fact that the winning side became and increasingly continues to be a vital and respected member of our global society, having an influence over large aspects of our lives including our education, our media and our governments.
While we might feel powerless in trying to stop the manipulation of money for private profit at our expense, it is easy to forget that we collectively give money its value. We have been taught to believe printed pieces of paper have special value, and because we know others believe this too, we are willing to work all our lives to get what we are convinced others will want.
An honest look at history will show us how our innocent trust has been misused.
Let’s start our exploration of money with:
JESUS FLIPS (many coins) 33 A.D.
Jesus was so upset by the sight of the money changers in the temple, he waded in and started to tip over the tables and drive them out with a whip, this being the one and only time we ever hear of him using force during his entire ministry.
So what caused the ultimate pacifist to become so aggressive?
For a long time the Jews had been called upon to pay their temple tax with a special coin called the half shekelshekel. It was a measured half ounce of pure silver with no image of a pagan emperor on it.
It was to them the only coin acceptable to God.
But because there was only a limited number of these coins in circulation, the money changers were in a buyers market and like with anything else in short supply, they were able to raise the price to what the market would bear.
They made huge profits with their monopoly on these coins and turned this time of devotion into a mockery for profit. Jesus saw this as stealing from the people and proclaimed the whole setup to be. “A den of thieves”. 1
Once money is accepted as a form of exchange, those who produce, loan out and manipulate the quantity of money are obviously in a very strong position. They are the “Money Changers“.
1. King James NT, Mt 21:13, Mr 11:17, Lu 19:46
MEDIEVAL ENGLAND (1000 – 1100 A.D.)
Here we find goldsmith’s offering to keep other people’s gold and silver safe in their vaults, and in return people walking away with a receipt for what they have left there.
These paper receipts soon became popular for trade as they were less heavy to carry around than gold and silver coins.
After a while, the goldsmith’s must have noticed that only a small percentage of their depositor’s ever came in to demand their gold at any one time. So cleverly the goldsmith’s made out some receipts for gold which didn’t even exist, and then they loaned it out to earn interest.
A nod and a wink amongst themselves, they incorporated this practice into the banking system. They even gave it a name to make it seem more acceptable, christening the practice ‘Fractional Reserve Banking’ which translates to mean, lending out many times more money than you have assets on deposit.
Today banks are allowed to loan out at least ten times the amount they actually are holding, so while you wonder how they get rich charging you 11% interest, it’s not 11% a year they make on that amount but actually 110%.
THE TALLY STICKS (1100 – 1854)
King Henry the First produced sticks of polished wood, with notches cut along one edge to signify the denominations. The stick was then split full length so each piece still had a record of the notches.
The King kept one half for proof against counterfeiting, and then spent the other half into the market place where it would continue to circulate as money.
Because only Tally Sticks were accepted by Henry for payment of taxes, there was a built in demand for them, which gave people confidence to accept these as money.
He could have used anything really, so long as the people agreed it had value, and his willingness to accept these sticks as legal tender made it easy for the people to agree. Money is only as valuable as peoples faith in it, and without that faith even today’s money is just paper.
The tally stick system worked really well for 726 years. It was the most successful form of currency in recent history and the British Empire was actually built under the Tally Stick system, but how is it that most of us are not aware of its existence?
Perhaps the fact that in 1694 the Bank of England at its formation attacked the Tally Stick System gives us a clue as to why most of us have never heard of them. They realised it was money outside the power of the money changers, (the very thing King Henry had intended).
What better way to eliminate the vital faith people had in this rival currency than to pretend it simply never existed and not discuss it. That seems to be what happened when the first shareholder’s in the Bank of England bought their original shares with notched pieces of wood and retired the system. You heard correctly, they bought shares. The Bank of England was set up as a privately owned bank through investors buying shares. Even the Banks resent nationalisation is not what it at first may appear, as its independent resources unceasingly multiply and dividends continue to be produced for its shareholder’s.
These investors, who’s names were kept secret, were meant to invest one and a quarter million pounds, but only three quarters of a million was received when it was chartered in 1694.
It then began to lend out many times more than it had in reserve, collecting interest on the lot.
This is not something you could just impose on people without preparation. The money changers needed to created the climate to make the formation of this private concern seem acceptable.
Here’s how they did it.
With King Henry VIII relaxing the Usury Laws in the 1500′s, the money changers flooded the market with their gold and silver coins becoming richer by the minute.
The English Revolution of 1642 was financed by the money changers backing Oliver Cromwell’s successful attempt to purge the parliament and kill King Charles. What followed was 50 years of costly wars. Costly to those fighting them and profitable to those financing them.
So profitable that it allowed the money changers to take over a square mile of property still known as the City of London, which remains one of the three main financial centres in the world today.
The 50 years of war left England in financial ruin. The government officials went begging for loans from guess who, and the deal proposed resulted in a government sanctioned, privately owned bank which could produce money from nothing, essentially legally counterfeiting a national currency for private gain.
Now the politicians had a source from which to borrow all the money they wanted to borrow, and the debt created was secured against public taxes.
You would think someone would have seen through this, and realised they could produce their own money and owe no interest, but instead the Bank of England has been used as a model and now nearly every nation has a Central Bank with fractional reserve banking at its core.
These central banks have the power to take over a nations economy and become that nations real governing force. What we have here is a scam of mammoth proportions covering what is actually a hidden tax, being collected by private concerns.
The country sells bonds to the bank in return for money it cannot raise in taxes. The bonds are paid for by money produced from thin air. The government pays interest on the money it borrowed by borrowing more money in the same way. There is no way this debt can ever be paid, it has and will continue to increase.
If the government did find a way to pay off the debt, the result would be that there would be no bonds to back the currency, so to pay the debt would be to kill the currency.
With its formation the Bank of England soon flooded Britain with money. With no quality control and no insistence on value for money, prices doubled with money being thrown in every direction.
One company was even offering to drain the Red Sea to find Egyptian gold lost when the sea closed in on their pursuit of Moses.
...So I am left wondering.  What company? Does it still exist? Who ran it? Does it matter to us now?

Friday, November 9, 2012

Will Obama's Grand Bargain of Austerity Unite the Occupy and TeaParty Movements?

Wishful thinking on my part for sure, but others are hoping for a populist movement to protest Greek-style austerity.



Apparently a budget deal to avoid the fiscal cliff is underway as suggested by Blackrock's CEO but will it simply mean Greek-style austerity for the country when 46 million are on food stamps and 30 million are unemployed or underemployed, while the rest are in prison or work for the government.

Here's more from the always awesome Zerohedge:


By now everyone knows how Americans feel about America: one quarter of the population (the half of the less than half that voted) is convinced the US is plunging into a socialist void that would make the USSR proud, another quarter of the population is furious at the wealthy and demands that they be taxed up the wazoo because "they didn't build that" but certainly profited from it, and is demanding wealth and income redistribution, while the silent majority is quietly picking up whatever pieces it can, and batting down the hatches, seeing very well, beyond the fog of bias and subjectivity, the inevitable epic deleveraging disaster, followed by even more epic printing that is coming this way. But how does the rest of the world see the US, especially now that the fiscal cliff (and the much less discussed debt ceiling debate: why, we don't know - it was "merely" the debt ceiling that led to a 20% drop in 2011). Yesterday, German financial media Spiegel provided a glimpse into just how Europe, which is knee deep in it as well, sees America. The verdict: the next Greece.

From Spiegel:
The US has more in common with heavily indebted southern European countries than it might like to admit. And if the country doesn't reach agreement on deficit reduction measures soon, the similarities could become impossible to ignore. The fiscal cliff looms in the near future, and its not just the US that is under threat.
The US has finally voted and the dark visions of America's future broadcast on television screens across the country -- and most intensively in battleground states -- have come to an end. Supporters of both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney had developed doomsday scenarios for what would happen if their candidate's opponent were to win. Four more years of Obama, the ads warned, would result in pure socialism. A Romney presidency would see the middle and lower classes brutally exploited.
But following Obama's re-election, Americans are now facing a different, much more real horror scenario: In just a few weeks time, thousands of children could be denied vaccinations, federally funded school programs could screech to a halt, adults may be forced to forego HIV tests and subsidized housing vouchers would dry up. Even the work of air-traffic controllers, the FBI, border officials and the military could be drastically curtailed.
That and more is looming just over the horizon according to the White House if the country is allowed to plunge off the "fiscal cliff" at the beginning of next year. Coined by Federal Reserve head Ben Bernanke, it refers to the vast array of cuts and tax increases which will automatically go into effect if Republicans and Democrats can't agree on measures to slash the US budget deficit.
***
Plunging Growth
As good as an instantaneous halving of the budget deficit might sound, the landing after a plunge off the fiscal cliff would be a hard one. Were taxes to be ratcheted up at the same time as state programs were slashed, it would have an enormous effect on the economy. According to the Congressional Budget Office, 2013 growth would immediately drop by four percentage points, making a recession unavoidable. The number of unemployed would be two million higher than without the cuts.
It is an eventuality that doesn't just put fear into the hearts of Americans. In its annual report on the US, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) referred to the fiscal cliff as the largest risk currently facing America. Investors have already reportedly become more cautious in the face of the looming cuts. Should politicians not agree to a credible plan for reducing US debt, it could ultimately harm the credibility of the dollar as a reserve currency. More immediately, the IMF writes in its World Economic Outlook report published in October, the drastic cuts "would inflict large spillovers on major US trading partners." In other words, an already fragile Europe would become even weaker.
As such, Germany won't be the only country watching closely as US Congress struggles to reach an agreement in coming weeks. Should the US economy radically slow down next year, "it could in the current atmosphere of uncertainty result in a global loss of confidence that would lead to a collapse in investment worldwide," according to the annual report of top German economic advisors released on Wednesday. Nevertheless, the experts warn, simply postponing measures to address the debt and budget deficit problems "would also have long-term costs in the form of still higher sovereign debt."
***
The Greek Model?
What, then, is the solution? In the end, the US could arrive at a compromise similar to the one that appears to be forming for Greece: austerity measures combined with more time to achieve budget deficit reduction targets. The drastic cuts currently looming are essentially a kind of debt brake, but it is one with no flexibility built in whatsoever. The US economist Denis Flower proposed in an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE that Washington should introduce a law mandating long-term debt reduction, but which allows higher deficits in times of crisis.
US politicians, no doubt, would not be fond of hearing their country compared to Greece. After all, the heavily indebted euro-zone country was used during the presidential campaign as a caricature for the horrors of European-style socialism. But their current finances are not dissimilar, with one difference being that the US can't count on outside help as the Greeks have received.
It remains to be seen how US politicians choose to approach the problem. Republicans, having defended their majority in the House of Representatives, could simply let the country plunge off the cliff in the hopes that it would be blamed on Obama. Or, on the other hand, their willingness to compromise may have been increased by virtue of losing the presidential election badly. Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner on Wednesday pledged to work closely with the White House as negotiations begin. He said that lawmakers won't be able to solve the country's problems overnight, but said that voters "gave us a mandate to work together to do the best thing for our country."
Greece's economic problems and the resulting austerity packages it has passed have plunged the country into five straight years of recession. Germany, Europe and the world are hoping that the same fate is not in store for the US.







Monday, November 5, 2012

Has Mitt Romney Been Exposed As a Bush and New World Order Puppet?


The evidence in this documentary is overwhelming for most, but if you have been a student of conspiracies involving George HW Bush, George Bush Jr., Dick Cheney, the CIA, Cointelpro, the Bilderberg Group, JFK, the October Surprise that displaced Jimmy Carter as the lead for the 1980 election, the Reagan assassination attempt, the Iran Contra affair, the 1995 FBI Murrah building attack, the 9/11 attacks, the Libyan revolution and assassination of Ghaddafi, and the most recent assassination of Ambassador Stevens in Libya.

Watch this video and do your own research.  When you search for alleged conspirators, add the search term "NWO" which is short for New World Order.  This is the term Hitler used in his 2nd book and that George HW Bush used in his presidential campaign and presidency.