California Breaking Up Into 6 States? - Global Economic Reset Happening

@Fabian4Liberty @RosaKoire @tjefferson1976 Check out my post on the #BayAreaMerger, #UNAgenda21, and Breaking Up California into 6 States.
— #SeizeTheFed (@TwistedPolitix) February 23, 2014

Will California Split into 6 States? Why? Cui Bono?

Tweets about "california 6 states"

Power of Drones - Totally Cool Uses for Drones - Trendy BS? Or Sinister Tech?

Air Force Bugbot Nano Drone Technology

The Knightscope K5 - Autonomous Data Machine - Robocop Drone Hits American Streets

Update: 9/30/2014

WTF? @knightscope in #FosterCity streets with #Robocop. I'll pay $100 to the first hacker that hijacks that shit pic.twitter.com/3hUrXOxZ1k
— #OpenYourMind (@TwistedPolitix) October 1, 2014

The local neighborhood watch may be beefing up its robotic arsenal if a new technology startup gets its way anytime soon. In a bid to make local communities safer and give local law enforcement agencies more tools to fight crime, California-based Knightscope recently unveiled a line of K5 robots that it believes will predict and prevent crime with an innovative combination of hardware, software and social engagement. The new K5 units have a look that resembles R2-D2 from Star Wars, but their casual design masks a highly advanced robot that its creators hope will drastically cut down on crime. Weighing in at 300 pounds, the five-foot K5 can patrol a neighborhood and uses a built-in laser to form a 3D map of the surrounding area in 270-degree sweeps. Four built-in cameras, meanwhile, are capable of scanning up to 1,500 license plates a minute.

 

McCain Supports Soros Revolution, Pleads for Ukraine to Join EU

Listen to John Perkins, author of "Confessions of an Economic Hitman".  This is how countries get hoodwinked.

The Truth About The Ukraine Crisis: George Soros is Heavily Involved

Washington Orchestrated Protests Are Destabilizing Ukraine - PaulCraigRoberts.org" ( http://bit.ly/1dcvp6m

Soros gets splattered in Ukraine" ( http://bbc.in/MJNMJA

"International Renaissance Foundation | Open Society Foundations (OSF)" ( http://osf.to/1dcw1sJ

Leading party says Soros prepares “Libyan scenario” for Ukraine — RT Russian politics" ( http://bit.ly/MJNWAL

"George Soros on The End of Ukraine? - Project Syndicate" ( http://bit.ly/1dcwkDN )

"The Struggle for Ukraine – Protests Made in Germany, America and the EU | Global Research" ( http://bit.ly/MJO5nD )

Soros Activists Take Over Ukrainian Government Buildings  http://bit.ly/1dcwCuu

International Renaissance Foundation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" ( http://bit.ly/MJOcjc



From a 2004 article:

    A chief adviser to the Ukrainian prime minister sees uncanny parallels between his boss's campaign for president and last week's U.S. presidential election.
    The Nov. 21 runoff between Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych and Viktor Yushchenko, a former prime minister, is too close to call. Each candidate received about 39 percent in the first round of voting on Oct. 31. Ukrainians appear divided between Mr. Yanukovych's rural supporters and Mr. Yushchenko's urban ones.
    Also, as in the American election, billionaire George Soros, who poured millions of dollars into efforts to defeat President Bush, is also spending millions on the campaign against Mr. Yanukovych, said Eduard Prutnik, the prime minister's adviser, on a visit to The Washington Times yesterday. 
    "It's very much alike. We hope the outcome will also be the same," he said, predicting a victory for Mr. Yanukovych by about five percentage points.
    Iraq is also an issue, with Mr. Yanukovych pledging to keep Ukraine's 1,600 troops within the U.S.-led coalition and Mr. Yushchenko promising to withdraw them within weeks if he is elected.
    One of Mr. Prutnik's goals on his visit to Washington this week is to try to explain why Mr. Yanukovych would be a better U.S. ally than his opponent, who is supported privately by some State Department officials and publicly by many Ukrainians in the United States.
    "Unfortunately, people in this town want to speak in terms of black and white, making one 100 percent positive and the other 100 percent negative," Mr. Prutnik said.
    Critics suspect Mr. Yanukovych of harboring authoritarian tendencies like the current president, Leonid Kuchma, who is supporting the prime minister. They also claim Mr. Yanukovych is too close to Russian President Vladimir Putin and would bring .....
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...\

Ukraine undecided

Free Trade Liberals and the Globalist New World Order EXPOSED

Keep the following article and videos in mind while you learn about the Trans Pacific Partnership (#TPP).  Also, think back to the 1990's: NAFTA and Bill Clinton combined with the introduction of China into the WTO, and the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preface: Liberals might assume that it is Republicans who are cheerleaders for global corporations at the expense of government.  But, as shown below, liberal politicians have been just as bad … or worse.

Matt Stoller – who writes for Salon and has contributed to Politico, Alternet, Salon, The Nation and Reuters – knows his way around Washington.

Stoller – a prominent liberal – has scoured the Congressional Record to unearth hidden historical facts.  For example, Stoller has previously shown that the U.S. government push for a “New World Order” is no wacky conspiracy theory, but extensively documented in the Congressional Record.

Now, Stoller uses the Congressional Record to show that “free trade” pacts were always about weakening nation-states to promote rule by multinationals:

Political officials (liberal ones, actually) engaged in an actual campaign to get rid of countries with their pesky parochial interests, and have the whole world managed by global corporations. Yup, this actually was explicit in the 1960s, as opposed to today’s passive aggressive arguments which amount to the same thing.

***

Liberal internationalists, including people like Chase CEO David Rockefeller and former Undersecretary of State and an architect of 1960s American trade policies George Ball, began pressing for reductions in non-tariff barriers, which they perceived as the next set of trade impediments to pull down. But the idea behind getting rid of these barriers wasn’t about free trade, it was about reorganizing the world so that corporations could manage resources for “the benefit of mankind”. It was a weird utopian vision that you can hear today in the current United States Trade Representative Michael Froman’s speeches. I’ve spoken with Froman about this history, and Froman himself does not seem to know much about it. But he is captive of these ideas, nonetheless, as is much of the elite class. They do not know the original ideology behind what is now just bureaucratic true believer-ism, they just know that free trade is good and right and true.

But back to the 1967 hearing. In the opening statement, before a legion of impressive Senators and Congressmen, Ball attacks the very notion of sovereignty. He goes after the idea that “business decisions” could be “frustrated by a multiplicity of different restrictions by relatively small nation states that are based on parochial considerations,” and lauds the multinational corporation as the most perfect structure devised for the benefit of mankind. He also foreshadows our modern world by suggesting that commercial, monetary, and antitrust policies should just be and will inevitably be handled by supranational organizations. [Background.]

Here’s just some of that statement. It really is worth reading, I’ve bolded the surprising parts.

“For the widespread development of the multinational corporation is one of our major accomplishments in the years since the war, though its meaning and importance have not been generally understood. For the first time in history man has at his command an instrument that enables him to employ resource flexibility to meet the needs of peopels all over the world. Today a corporate management in Detroit or New York or London or Dusseldorf may decide that it can best serve the market of country Z by combining the resources of country X with labor and plan facilities in country Y – and it may alter that decision 6 months from now if changes occur in costs or price or transport. It is the ability to look out over the world and freely survey all possible sources of production… that is enabling man to employ the world’s finite stock of resources with a new degree of efficiency for the benefit of all mandkind.

But to fulfill its full potential the multinational corporation must be able to operate with little regard for national boundaries – or, in other words, for restrictions imposed by individual national governments.

To achieve such a free trading environment we must do far more than merely reduce or eliminate tariffs. We must move in the direction of common fiscal concepts, a common monetary policy, and common ideas of commercial responsibility. Already the economically advanced nations have made some progress in all of these areas through such agencies as the OECD and the committees it has sponsored, the Group of Ten, and the IMF, but we still have a long way to go. In my view, we could steer a faster and more direct course… by agreeing that what we seek at the end of the voyage is the full realization of the benefits of a world economy.

Implied in this, of course, is a considerable erosion of the rigid concepts of national sovereignty, but that erosion is taking place every day as national economies grow increasingly interdependent, and I think it desirable that this process be consciously continued. What I am recommending is nothing so unreal and idealistic as a world government, since I have spent too many years in the guerrilla warfare of practical diplomacy to be bemused by utopian visions. But it seems beyond question that modern business – sustained and reinforced by modern technology – has outgrown the constrictive limits of the antiquated political structures in which most of the world is organized, and that itself is a political fact which cannot be ignored. For the explosion of business beyond national borders will tend to create needs and pressures that can help alter political structures to fit the requirements of modern man far more adequately than the present crazy quilt of small national states. And meanwhile, commercial, monetary, and antitrust policies – and even the domiciliary supervision of earth-straddling corporations – will have to be increasingly entrusted to supranational institutions….

We will never be able to put the world’s resources to use with full efficiency so long as business decisions are frustrated by a multiplicity of different restrictions by relatively small nation states that are based on parochial considerations, reflect no common philosophy, and are keyed to no common goal.” ***

These ["free trade"] agreements are not and never have been about trade. You simply cannot disentangle colonialism, the American effort to create the European Union, and American trade efforts. After their opening statements, Ball and Rockefeller go on on to talk about how European states need to be wedged into a common monetary union with our trade efforts and that Latin America needs to be managed into prosperity by the US and Africa by Europe. Through such efforts, they thought that the US could put together a global economy over the next thirty years. Thirty years later was 1997, which was exactly when NAFTA was being implemented and China was nearing its entry into the WTO. Impeccable predictions, gents.

***

I guess it turns out that the conspiracy theorists who believe in UN-controlled black helicopters aren’t as wrong as you might think about trade policy, and not just because United Technologies, which actually makes black helicopters, has endorsed the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

***

These agreements are about getting rid of national sovereignty, and the people who first pressed for NAFTA were explicit about it. They really did want a global government for corporations.

***

Ball in particular expressed his idea of a government by the corporations, for the corporations, in order to benefit all mankind. Keep that in mind when you think you’re being paranoid.

The full hearing can be downloaded here, though it is a big file.

The bottom line is not that liberals – or conservatives – are evil.

It’s that neither the Democratic or Republican parties reflect the true values of the American people (and see this).

Indeed, a scripted psuedo-war between the parties is often used by the powers-that-be as a way to divide and conquer the American people, so that we are too distracted to stand up to reclaim our power from the idiots in both parties who are only governing for their own profit … and a small handful of their buddies. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.

Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined #NWO

Climate Engineering Weather Warfare, and the Collapse of Civilization #UNAgenda21

British PM @David_Cameron says #chemtrails don't exist + are prohibited by int'l treaty. RT if you don't believe him. pic.twitter.com/OHyMaEzG75
— James Corbett (@corbettreport) April 13, 2014

For more on the #UNAgenda21 series involving climate engineering, hoaxes, solutions, and more see these articles:

10 Climate Myths Busted (in 60 seconds!) 

UN Links Overpopulation to Climate Change, Launch Programs for Depopulation

Does the UN believe overpopulation the cause of climate change?

Sustainable Development, Agenda 21 and Population Control 

Is the Bay Area merger part of United Nations Agenda 21?

Agenda 21 is a Global Austerity Plan Prepared by Bankers

Is Climate Change a Hoax or a Distraction? Man Made or Natural Adjustments

United Nations Formation, Population Control, Eugenics, Rockefeller 

Population Control - Nixon & Rockefeller 1972

Brilliant podcasts (long) from Tragedy and Hope:

Peace Revolution episode 061: Cybernetics, Technocracy, and Agenda 21

Peace Revolution episode 068: From Feudalism to Agenda 21

Peace Revolution episode 066: How Central Bankers Harness and Manipulate Human Resources

Peace Revolution episode 064: The Scientific Racism of Eugenics and Social Darwinism

CIA And Government Destabilisation

The Mena Connection: Bush, Clinton, and CIA Drug Smuggling (1995) Full L...

The CIA and the National Endowment for Democracy

Unite and Conquer: Fighting Back Against the Oligarchy #CommonGround

Once again James Corbett nails it!



Remember this? I still say, and am validated more and more that there is #CommonGround between all the different independents across the country.

See my article entitled "Would a coalition of TeaParty and Occupy Makes Sense?"

The answer is YES! The Proving ground is #TPP

Tweets about "#tpp"

#goodnewsnextweek Independents Outnumber Both Democrats and Republicans in 44 of 50 States http://t.co/gU4Pu4iUGI
— saergant cash (@SaergantC) March 3, 2015

"A Corporate Trojan Horse": Obama Pushes Secretive TPP Trade Pact, Would...

Would-Be Bomber Turns out to be Double Agent

Underwear Bomber Worked for the CIA & Saudi Intelligence

Now this is an interesting story that got a lot of media hype and attention at the time it occurred but not when it was revealed that he worked for the CIA and Saudi Intelligence!



According to The Guardian:

Bomber involved in plot to attack US-bound jet was working as an informer with Saudi intelligence and the CIA, it has emerged.

It goes on to say:

A would-be "underwear bomber" involved in a plot to attack a US-based jet was in fact working as an undercover informer with Saudi intelligence and the CIA, it has emerged.
The revelation is the latest twist in an increasingly bizarre story about the disruption of an apparent attempt by al-Qaida to strike at a high-profile American target using a sophisticated device hidden in the clothing of an attacker.
The plot, which the White House said on Monday had involved the seizing of an underwear bomb by authorities in the Middle East sometime in the last 10 days, had caused alarm throughout the US.
It has also been linked to a suspected US drone strike in Yemen where two Yemeni members of al-Qaida were killed by a missile attack on their car on Sunday, one of them a senior militant, Fahd Mohammed Ahmed al-Quso.
But the news that the individual at the heart of the bomb plot was in fact an informer for US intelligence is likely to raise just as many questions as it answers.

One has to ask, how often does this happen.  (Hint: A lot!)

Tweets about ""underwear bomber""

Say NO to the National Internet Tax Mandate!

Andrew, 

The only thing politicians love more than spending your money is taking more of it. 

Tax-and-spend senators in BOTH parties have already RAMMED through a new taxing scheme that's been years in the works - the National Internet Tax Mandate. 

Should it pass the House, every man, woman, and child in the country will feel the pinch as Congress takes a MASSIVE bite out of American prosperity. 

Campaign for Liberty President John Tate explains below why the National Internet Tax Mandate scheme is so dangerous. 

Please read his email and take action IMMEDIATELY. 

And after you sign your petition, please forward this email to anyone - and everyone - you know. 

For Liberty, 

Ron Paul
Chairman 

---

Andrew,

Harry Reid and big-spending, high-tax statists in BOTH parties have already RAMMED the National Internet Tax Mandate through the Senate. 

And without C4L members' continued action, it could be gaveled through the House and sent to Barack Obama’s desk for his guaranteed signature. 

So it’s absolutely critical you sign the petition I've made up for you DEMANDING Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor KILL the National Internet Tax Mandate in the House. 

I'll give you the link shortly, but first let me explain exactly why this is so important... 

Currently, because of the Founders' vision for our country, states are "laboratories" - free to set their own tax policies. 

High-tax, big-spending, highly regulatory state governments send businesses and citizens alike fleeing across state lines in search of more liberty. 

But under the National Internet Tax Mandate scheme, the statists are setting the stage to bring it all to a crashing halt. 



Under the National Internet Tax Mandate: 

*** All Americans would pay more for the “privilege” of shopping online, as big-spending governors of BOTH parties work with the federal government to implement the Mandate. 

Big-spending governors are running their states into bankruptcy, and - instead of reducing spending - they want Congress to force YOU to bail them out with Internet sales tax revenue! 

*** Tax collectors in one state would now be free to pursue retailers across state lines. 

For example, if a customer in New York makes a purchase from an online retailer in Texas, that retailer MUST collect New York's exorbitant sales taxes and send them to New York's tax collection agencies; 

*** New and higher taxes would CRUSH economic growth and set the stage for massive new regulations that threaten the very existence of the Internet. 

Make no mistake. 

This is all bad enough on its face. 

But it's hardly the end of it. 

You and I both know, under the guise of "national security," establishment bureaucrats are already feverishly looking for new ways to trace, track, and register all Americans' online activity. 

What you read. What you buy. What videos you watch. What you write about THEM. 

Now the one-world socialists at the United Nations want in on the action, as well. 



In fact, the U.N. has already drafted a new "Telecommunications Treaty" to impose restrictive regulations, global CENSORSHIP, and a massive new tax on all Internet operations. 

If ratified by the United States Senate, the United Nations' Treaty could give control of the Internet to U.N. bureaucrats. 

Ultimately, the U.N. hopes to use this scheme to take a tax bite out of the TRILLIONS of dollars exchanging hands via Internet commerce - money that will make the U.N. a true world government. 

And this National Internet Tax Mandate is playing right into their hands. 

That's why it's so critical you sign your No Internet Tax petition and make your most generous contribution of $100, $50, or $35 to C4L IMMEDIATELY. 

Even if you can only chip in $20 or $10, it will make a tremendous difference. 

Just like the Wall Street bailouts and the "deal" over the debt ceiling during the so-called "government shutdown," this National Internet Tax Mandate is "bipartisan" to its core. 

And statists in BOTH parties are determined to RAM this scheme into law. 

Governors from all over the country who literally CANNOT wait to get more tax money are busy bending the ears of Congress. 



And with big spenders in BOTH parties lining up in support of increasing government control over the Internet, I’m afraid this legislation - or some sort of so-called "compromise" - could make it through the House unless you act today. 

Will you stand by while the big taxers grab yet more tax dollars from hardworking Americans? 

Do you simply shrug your shoulders at the thought of United Nations global socialists shutting down the free flow of information worldwide? 

Or will you help me FIGHT BACK? 

Please take a moment to sign your petition DEMANDING Bob Goodlatte, Eric Cantor, and John Boehner kill the National Internet Tax IMMEDIATELY. 

And if you can, please make your most generous contribution to C4L TODAY. 

Your generosity will help me alert hundreds of thousands of Americans to this critical fight and stop the National Internet Tax Mandate. 

C4L will use mail, email, and hard-hitting Internet ads - and even newspaper, radio, and TV ads, if necessary. 

And with the fight going on right now, this won't be cheap. 

But it will be what it takes to win. 

During the Senate fight over the National Internet Tax Mandate, Campaign for Liberty generated phone calls and thousands of petitions in opposition to taxing the Internet. 

When the fight began, the statists thought they could ram their bill through the Senate with as many as 90 votes. 

Capitol Hill insiders have told me and my staff that Campaign for Liberty's efforts were the key to changing the minds of many senators and making sure the bill passed in the Senate with far fewer votes than expected - greatly helping stall the bill's momentum. 

If you and I can generate this type of massive pressure on the U.S. House, I'm confident we can DEFEAT the statists' attempt to get more of your money through the Internet. 

So in addition to signing your petition, won't you please agree to your most generous contribution of $100, $50, or $35 IMMEDIATELY? 

Even if all you can do is chip in $10 or $20 to this fight, please do so right away. 

There's no time to waste. 

In Liberty,

John Tate
President 

BREAKING! FEDS OK BANKS TO DO BUSINESS WITH LEGAL MARIJUANA BUSINESSES

Clean Energy Drives Bill Gates' to Bankruptcy in Texas

Submitted by Charles Kennedy via OilPrice.com,

Bill Gates’ Texas energy company has filed for bankruptcy protection as the depressed power market results in untenable financial losses.

The company, Optim Energy (EnergyCo LLC), owned by a Gates investment fund, filed Chapter 11 Bankruptcy papers on Wednesday for its three power plants in eastern Texas, citing their inability to counter growing losses in the current market.

"The current depressed economic environment of the electric power industry – particularly with respect to coal-fired plants – and the debtors' liquidity constraints have resulted in continuing losses that, simply put, have left the debtors without alternatives," media quoted Optim CEO Nick Rahn as saying in court documents.

According to the documents, Optim has $713 million outstanding under a credit agreement with Wells Fargo, while its total estimated assets are worth less than $500 million. For 2013, Optim recorded revenues of $236 million.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Optim said its executives had failed to obtain consent to borrow more money under a credit facility.

Optim is reportedly planning to sell its coal-fired Twin Oaks plant during the bankruptcy, while the other two plants natural-gas fired.

Optim was founded in 2007, and electricity prices began to fall shortly afterwards, hindering the company’s ability to repay borrowed money.

Reductions in natural gas prices have hit power companies hard over the past several years, and Optim is the third to file for bankruptcy recently, following Dynegy Inc and Edison Mission Energy.

Optim notes in its court filings that the price of electricity in the company’s market area has fallen roughly 40% in the past five years, from around $63.24 per megawatt hour in 2008 to around $38 per megawatt hour by December 2013.

Optim’s owner, ECJV Holdings LLC, is owned by Cascade Investment LLC, an investment vehicle for Gates, the Microsoft Corp. co-founder and the world’s richest person, according to Bloomberg.

Did solar and wind prices contribute to this as well?  Perhaps.  Read the article below

Wholesale Price of Electricity Drops to $0.00 in Texas, Due to Wind Energy | CleanTechnica http://po.st/WA18cgTexas claims cheapest solar installations, as prices drop nationwide http://bit.ly/1bw78gS

Does this mean Bill Gates' status as the world's richest man is in jeopardy?  Don't think so.

Bill Gates’ nuclear company explores molten salt reactors, thorium - The Weinberg Foundation http://bit.ly/1dQvPig
Bill Gates Is Beginning to Dream the Thorium Dream | Motherboard http://bit.ly/1bw7J1T