Is the Bay Area Merger and Breakup of California part of United Nations Agenda 21?

Watch this video first, then read the article below written back in February 2013.



From February 9, 2013:

Sitting down for lunch with the family on Saturday the following headline in the San Mateo Daily Journal caught my eye.

Bay Area leaders consider merger
The article begins explaining how business and civic leaders gathered in San Jose to "consider the advantages of merging the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley into a single region, sharing everything from city dumps to water treatment plants as communities sprawl across borders."

Most people probably read the article and thought "oh how wonderful, they will be able to achieve certain economic efficiencies by consolidating governments, structuring better public transportation connections, and so forth.

The article goes on to say:

"Leaders attending the State of the Valley conference Friday noted that Bay Area residents, businesses and local governments face the same challenges, from gridlock and earthquakes to steep housing prices and climate change." 

 So apparently there are economic, environmental, and social crises in the area that need to be addressed.  PROBLEM.

Most people would agree that there are a plethora of issues in the Bay Area, but in general it is a pleasant place to live.  It's true we have one of the world's most expensive housing markets in the world, but we also have fairly stable and near maximized employment.  It's true we have horrific public schools despite collecting an enormous amount of money from property taxes, but most who can afford it send their kids to private schools, or rent houses in Cupertino so their kids can go to amazing public schools.  We also have at least 2 separate train systems (Caltrain and BART) that do not coordinate well with each other nor with the bus systems, but apart from Denver, Chicago and New York City no American cities have decent public transportation.  Regardless, the Bay Area is running fairly well.  Many disagree and therein lies the REACTION.

The articles continues with the stated public objective of the proposal.  SOLUTION

...the region, which amounts to the world’s 13th-largest economy, should continue to boom if they coordinate their planning and consider merging transit systems, police and fire services and even city governments.  

Technology forecaster Paul Saffo told conference participants that sharing everything from landfills to police helicopters could make the entire area more efficient, save money and help businesses remain competitive.

 If we just merge our diaspora of cities around the bay, we will continue to achieve economic growth.  I didn't know that was an issue.  I mean we all know that California proper is near bankruptcy following the global economic crisis of 2008, but the Silicon Valley and most of the Bay Area has hardly been disturbed.

Saving money, cutting bureaucratic waste, and achieving economies of scale are all wonderful theoretical objectives.  That is rarely what happens when power centers are created.  Look at Washington DC.  But that doesnt stop the virtuous solicitations of POWER.

“Powerful regions are the new basic unit of governments in the 21st century,” said Saffo, pointing to Singapore and Hong Kong. “City states are the powerful nexus of power, commerce, culture and identity.”

This must be the true objective.  To create powerful city states like Rome, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Perhaps this is to counter the powerless small towns that collectively make up the region at this time.

The whole conference was setup to meet following the release of a 2013 Index of Silicon Valley  which found the region is leading the country out of the recession with 92,000 new jobs last year.   It turns out the index and the conference were both sponsored by Joint Venture Silicon Valley Network and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, both nonprofits associated with the region’s businesses and governments.

Who is the Joint Venture Silicon Valley Network and what are their goals and objectives?  According to their website it was

Established in 1993, Joint Venture Silicon Valley provides analysis and action on issues affecting our region's economy and quality of life. The organization brings together established and emerging leaders—from business, government, academia, labor and the broader community—to spotlight issues and work toward innovative solutions.

They have an interesting list of private sector sponsors, many who have been bailed out or have nefarious connections with the military industrial complex.  Interestingly enough the public sector sponsors includes the Kingdom of the Netherlands.  Why would they be interested in economic efficiencies and centralized power houses?  Well, the Netherlands and the US are signatories to the United Nations Agenda 21 kicked off in 1992.  Agenda 21 is a very controversial world government initiative that has been protested since its inception.  From the UN USA website, it is defined as:

Agenda 21 encourages, rather than compels, UN Member States to take into consideration the environmental impacts of their land, resources, and transportation development policies. Adopted at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, the document reflects a broad international consensus that worsening poverty and growing stresses on the environment require greater integration between environmental and development concerns.

Many have exposed the nefarious hidden goals of the United Nations as an attempt at world government controlled by a royal elite with a collectivist agenda.  Remember the US sponsor of the United Nations was Alger Hiss, a convicted communist spy and since its inception it has been sponsored by powerful tax exempt foundations belonging to the robber barons of the early 20th century, such as the Rockefellers.

It is clear that this article is insufficient in revealing the smoking gun behind a global conspiracy to drive us into slavery but it should be a good start to spark legitimate investigation by those who would be affected.

The questions we should be asking are:

• What are the connections to Agenda 21?
• Who would benefit from the merger of regional cities?
• Who would lead such an regional powerhouse? Would they be elected or technocratic appointees of the elite?
• How will a larger bureaucracy of concentrated power be more efficient and to the benefit of local residents? The larger the governmental unit, the greater the prospects for significant corruption.  Haven't we seen the Federal Government become a corrupt and tyrannical tool of a wealthy elite?Why would a new city state be any different?
• Where will decisions be made about zoning, licensing, and permits?

• Will it negate or make obsolete the local city councils?
• Will there be a regional banking entity and will it be private or public?
• What will it have in common with the Vatican, DC, and the City of London?
• Wouldn't smaller service suppliers be crowded out to larger organizations that supposedly have greater economies of scale? That means local businesses and start up will be squeezed out of the market.  This is what critics of Walmart complain about. 
• Where will our food supply come from? If we continue to build and develop housing and industry at the expense of farming, aren't we increasing our dependence on imported foods and our risk associated? 
• Will GMOs be acceptable food sources for this new City State?
• How will this affect local public schools? 

http://www.futureagenda.org/pg/cx/view#422

Paul Saffo has commented that ‘our world is moving from one of nation-states to one of city-states. Rather than the future being one of the US versus China, it is going to be Silicon Valley vs. Beijing or Chicago vs. Paris. Each dominant city will define its region. With the “flattening” of the world, Chicago is no longer vying with US cities like New York for influence, commerce and jobs, but other major cities in the world.’ The MIT 19.20.21 programme is just one of several research studies underway that are looking at future urban environments. Predicting that there will be nineteen cities with over 20 million populations in the 21st century, this sees that ‘the rise of supercities is the defining megatrend of the 21st century’.

http://www.sanjoseinside.com/news/entries/07_14_10_should_the_city_of_san_jose_merge_with_santa_clara_county/

http://www.i4u.com/2013/02/paul-saffo/consider-area-merging-region-leaders-bay

Who is Paul Saffo?

http://www.saffo.com/about-paul-saffo/

"Powerful regions are the new basic unit of governments in the 21st century ... City states are the powerful nexus of power, commerce, culture and identity."

Read more at http://www.i4u.com/2013/02/paul-saffo/area-merging-leaders-region-bay-consider#S23PrssUQhjk0kem.99

Our democracy is utterly dependent upon an informed and engaged citizenry. We must talk to each other about politics to form thoughtful opinions and maybe learn something that will help us run our communities. We may as well start at home.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Americans-should-talk-about-politics-more-2336100.php#ixzz2L09wP3BM

• Member WEF Global Agenda Council on Innovation
• Member, WEF Global Agenda Council on Strategic Foresight

The World Economic Forum is a collection of 80 Councils worldwide.  GlobalAgenda Council Members are calling for global governance.

By Paul Saffo - Bay Area act like a city state

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/The-Bay-Area-needs-to-act-like-a-city-state-3259069.php

Paul Saffo is managing director of foresight at Discern Analytics and nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.

http://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/WIN_programma_FINAL.pdf

A new Bretton Woods is in our future, a moment when chastened global leaders will commit to building a new institutional order. But it will take another, larger economic crisis before the collective will to do so is found. In the meantime, we must immediately undertake another equally important task: We need to create a global economic observatory, an entity capable of collecting and digesting the data needed to truly understand the global economy in all its shifting complexity.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/03/3_get_better_data?page=0,1

Only time will tell, just remember the old adage:

Power corrupts.  Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

CIA ASSET BLOWS THE WHISTLE ON 911 INSIDE JOB

Susan Lindauer (CIA / 9/11) Susan was a former CIA asset who worked with the Libyan and Iraqi embassies prior to 9/11. Following that day, she began to reveal CIA complicity in Middle East heroin trafficking.

Lindauer also talked candidly about how Israel tried to buy U.S. Intelligence officers and Assets. For the first time on record, she revealed that a known Mossad agent tried to bribe her into handing over Iraq’s collection of banking records on Al Qaeda’s financial pipeline by phoning her home in Maryland while she was traveling in Baghdad, and promising to deliver a suitcase full of cash to any city in the world in exchange for the papers. (Source)

Susan subsequently became the second non-Arab citizen to be arrested under the Patriot Act, which culminated in a five-year indictment and near total prison lockdown for one year.

While in prison Susan was subjected to harsh conditions that would be considered torture in multiple countries. Contrary to what most Americans think, Susan and the other inmates in solitary confinement were only allowed outside once every TEN days and even then the actual amount of time outside was closer to thirty minutes. (Source)

In the video below she discusses her revelations about pre-9/11 warnings and all that followed, which eventually got published in her book Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover-ups of 9/11 and Iraq.

Nefarious Kroll and AIG Now Warning of Cyberattacks After 9/11 Success

For any of you not familiar with Kroll & Associates and AIG's involvement with 9/11 you should watch this film.  Then read the article below and ask yourself, what type of cyberattacks are Kroll and AIG planning?

Now after watching that, watch this and the additional 12 segments:

--------------------------------------------

AIG Survey: Execs Say Cyber Attacks A Top Threat

  Text Size    

 Published: Wednesday, 6 Feb 2013 | 1:26 PM ET

By: Mary Thompson

CNBC Reporter

Twitter 24

LinkedIn 3

Share

The threat of a cyber attack tops the threat of losing money as the primary risk business executives are concerned about, according to a new survey sponsored by the insurance giant AIG.

...

"It's becoming a C-suite problem," said John Gambale, Head of Professional Liability & Lexington Financial Lines at AIG. "[The executives are] asking what information are we collecting? Who has access to that information? How is it being stored? Where is it being stored? Is that information on a laptop, and is that laptop leaving the building? Is it leaving the country?" (Read More: Businesses Facing Increasing Cyber Threats: Security Experts)

Cyber-attacks have been a growing threat for well over a decade now, impacting victims ranging from the Federal Reserve to the country's largest banks to the discount retailer T.J. Maxx. Companies most likely to be targets are those that collect important personal information like providers of financial services, health care, and higher education as well as e-tailers.

"Any entity with personal, identifiable information — anything that can be converted to money is at risk," said Michael DuBose, Managing Director, Cyber Investigations Practice at the security firm Kroll. He pointed out the top threat to corporate America continues to be from insiders stealing trade secrets and other data, and selling it to rivals or foreign countries, though cyber-attacks cannot be ignored.

...

DuBose said the hacker, via malware or malicious software, can now infiltrate a system and stay for months, monitoring data traffic and other information without being detected by the anti-virus scans employed by most corporations. (Read More:Pentagon in Major Expansion of Cybersecurity Force )

...

Still, the executives surveyed by AIG are less concerned with the financial cost of an attack, than with the reputational damage an attack might cause, said Gambale. He pointed out keeping their clients information safe is critical to what many corporations do. If a data breach causes a firm to lose the trust of their clients, they lose their clients' business.

Since 1999, AIG's been in the business of insuring against these attacks. Gambale estimated cyber insurance is now a $500 million to $600 million business — one some estimate could reach a billion dollars in a few years. (Read More: How to Protect Your Devices From New Hack Threat )

Like the attacks themselves, the business of insuring against them have changed. In the past AIG provided services after a breach, including a breach coach, forensic assistance in tracing the breach, credit monitoring and notification services to clients. Today, its sells a product called CyberEdge.

CyberEdge provides proactive protection by putting additional software outside a firm's firewall to prevent globally known "bad" IP addresses from getting through that firewall. It is a product Gambale believes is for any firm, large or small.

...

Kroll works with AIG in providing forensic services to the insurer's clients after a breach has happened. DuBose said cyber insurance is a good thing for firms, as it provides a remedial infrastructure that they may not develop on their own. (Read More: Former US Spy Warns on Cybersecurity )

The full article in it's original form can be found here....

-By CNBC's Mary Thompson; Follow her on Twitter @MThompsonCNBC

----------------------------------------

Mary Thompson is either completely ignoring historical fact related to AIG and their CIA connections and nefarious acts of the past, or she is innocently ignorant.  Well, what do you expect from CNBC, owned by Comcast and GE, who greatly benefited from bailouts and the war on terror launched after 9/11.

But how can you blame CNBC? The propaganda machine is simply parroting what they are told by Leon Panetta (see here) and we know that Obama secretly signs the most aggressive cybersecurity directive ever (see here) and with good reason, right because banks are saying that hackers in Iran (see here) and China (see here)are responsible.   

After all, the cyber security experts say that we should expect another 9/11, another Pearl Harbor.  Kroll is among those experts foretelling the doomsday scenarios (see here).

Just like the WMDs of Iraq, and the Al-Qaeda terrorist network that circumvented the most advanced and most expensive defense network in the history of the world, we should know, because we have the receipts  we are actively waging a cyber war against Iran (see here and here).

But we can always depend on our government to take these threats seriously and use our tax dollars wisely to protect its citizens (well, not always, see here, and here).

Certainly Kroll and AIG have no influence over our foreign policy, right? There is no connection.  They can't create an imaginary threat and then force our government to go to war, just so than can profit from it, right?  No, that kind of thing never happens.  I mean there is no place that Kroll and AIG can bend the ear of government on foreign policy, is there?

Justice is Served. Facebook is ordered to pay $20 Million, I could get $10.

Justice is SERVED!!!!

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

ANGEL FRALEY V. FACEBOOK, INC.

You are receiving this e-mail because you may have been featured in a "Sponsored Story" on Facebook prior to December 3, 2012.

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

Why did I get this notice? This Notice relates to a proposed settlement ("Settlement") of a class action lawsuit ("Action") filed against Facebook relating to a particular Facebook feature called "Sponsored Stories." According to available records, you may be a "Class Member."

What is the Action about? The Action claims that Facebook unlawfully used the names, profile pictures, photographs, likenesses, and identities of Facebook users in the United States to advertise or sell products and services through Sponsored Stories without obtaining those users' consent. Facebook denies any wrongdoing and any liability whatsoever. No court or other entity has made any judgment or other determination of any liability.

What is a Sponsored Story? Sponsored Stories are a form of advertising that typically contains posts which appeared on facebook.com about or from a Facebook user or entity that a business, organization, or individual has paid to promote so there is a better chance that the posts will be seen by the user or entity's chosen audience. Sponsored Stories may be displayed, for example, when a Facebook user interacts with the Facebook service (including sub-domains, international versions, widgets, plug-ins, platform applications or games, and mobile applications) in certain ways, such as by clicking on the Facebook "Like" button on a business's, organization's, or individual's Facebook page. Sponsored Stories typically include a display of a Facebook user's Facebook name (i.e., the name the user has associated with his or her Facebook account) and/or profile picture (if the user has uploaded one) with a statement describing the user's interaction with the Facebook service, such as "John Smith likes UNICEF," "John Smith played Farmville," or "John Smith shared a link."

What relief does the Settlement provide? Facebook will pay $20 million into a fund that can be used, in part, to pay claims of Class Members (including Minor Class Members) who appeared in a Sponsored Story. Each participating Class Member who submits a valid and timely claim form may be eligible to receive up to $10. The amount, if any, paid to each claimant depends upon the number of claims made and other factors detailed in the Settlement. No one knows in advance how much each claimant will receive, or whether any money will be paid directly to claimants. If the number of claims made renders it economically infeasible to pay money to persons who make a timely and valid claim, payment will be made to the not-for-profit organizations identified on the Settlement website at www.fraleyfacebooksettlement.com(if clicking on the link does not work, copy and paste the website address into a web browser). These organizations are involved in educational outreach that teaches adults and children how to use social media technologies safely, or are involved in research of social media, with a focus on critical thinking around advertising and commercialization, and particularly with protecting the interests of children.

In addition to monetary relief, Facebook will (a) revise its terms of service (known as the "Statement of Rights and Responsibilities" or "SRR") to more fully explain the instances in which users agree to the display of their names and profile pictures in connection with Sponsored Stories; (b) create an easily accessible mechanism that enables users to view, on a going-forward basis, the subset of their interactions and other content on Facebook that have been displayed in Sponsored Stories (if any); (c) develop settings that will allow users to prevent particular items or categories of content or information related to them from being displayed in future Sponsored Stories; (d) revise its SRR to confirm that minors represent that their parent or legal guardian consents to the use of the minor's name and profile picture in connection with commercial, sponsored, or related content; (e) provide parents and legal guardians with additional information about how advertising works on Facebook in its Family Safety Center and provide parents and legal guardians with additional tools to control whether their children's names and profile pictures are displayed in connection with Sponsored Stories; and (f) add a control in minor users' profiles that enables each minor user to indicate that his or her parents are not Facebook users and, where a minor user indicates that his or her parents are not on Facebook, Facebook will make the minor ineligible to appear in Sponsored Stories until he or she reaches the age of 18, until the minor changes his or her setting to indicate that his or her parents are on Facebook, or until a confirmed parental relationship with the minor user is established.

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM This is the only way to be eligible to receive a payment, if the Court orders payment to Class Members. Deadline: May 2, 2013 EXCLUDE YOURSELF This is the only option that allows you to retain the ability to file your own lawsuit about the legal claims in this case. Deadline: May 2, 2013 OBJECT Write to the Court about why you object to (i.e., don't like) the Settlement and think it shouldn't be approved. Deadline: May 2, 2013 GO TO THE "FAIRNESS HEARING" The Court will hold a "Fairness Hearing" to consider the Settlement, the request for attorneys' fees and expenses of the lawyers who brought the Action ("Class Counsel"), and the class representatives' request for service awards for bringing the Action.   You may, but are not required to, speak at the Fairness Hearing about any Objection you filed. If you intend to speak at the Fairness Hearing, you must follow the procedures stated on the Settlement website to notify the Court and parties of your intent when you serve your Objection. Hearing Date: June 28, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. DO NOTHING You will not receive a payment, even if the Court orders payment to Class Members. You will also be giving up your right to bring your own lawsuit related to the claims in the Action. You may be eligible to receive the non-monetary benefits of the Settlement, if the Settlement is finally approved. No deadline

Your Class Member Number: 221764215

To Parents and Guardians of Children on Facebook: The Settlement also involves the claims of minors featured in Sponsored Stories on Facebook. Please see the Settlement website for more information.

More information? For more information about the Settlement and how to take the actions described above, please visit www.fraleyfacebooksettlement.com (if clicking on the link does not work, copy and paste the website address into a web browser) or write to the Settlement Administrator at Fraley v. Facebook, Inc., Settlement, c/o GCG, P.O. Box 35009, Seattle, WA 98124-1009, or GCG@fraleyfacebooksettlement.com. You may also contact Class Counsel, Robert S. Arns of the Arns Law Firm, by calling 1-888-214-5125 or by emailing fb.settlement@arnslaw.com.

Data Proves USA is an Empire by Force

YOU, the American tax payer, YOU are funding the largest military empire the world has ever known and when you hear a debate about budget cuts to this and that, just remember YOU are paying for the world's largest military and that military is spread out all over the world (see the 2nd image below).

If you followed alternative media and not the New York Times you might actually learn that various parts of the US government, rogue individuals, departments, and siloed squads, are behind most of the conflagrations around the world, which then justifies the additional military spending, and so on.

So where is all the money deployed?

More Israeli Connections to the 9-11-2001 Terrorist Attacks

Most people think that the 9-11 terrorists attacks were carried out by muslim extremists lead by Osama Bin Ladin.  That's what the US government and large corporate owned mass media want you to think.

Watch this video and read this article.  2 small pieces in a very large investigation.

Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11

By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor


Jul 31, 2006, 00:19

Think of this as part two of Recherche du trillions perdu, my Online Journal article on Dov Zakheim, former Bush appointee as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as I mentioned, was buried under 9-11’s rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim’s watch.

Yet on May 6, 2004, Zakheim took a lucrative position at Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the most prestigious strategy consulting firms in the world. One of its clients then was Blessed Relief, a charity said to be a front for Osama bin Laden. Booz, Allen & Hamilton then also worked closely with DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is the research arm of the Department of Defense. So the dark card was shifted to another part of the deck.

Judicial Inc’s bio of Dov (linked below) tells us Zakheim was/is a dual Israeli/American citizen and an ordained rabbi and had been tracking the halls of US government for 25 years, casting defense policy and influence on Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. He is, as I described him earlier, the bionic Zionist. In fact, Judicial Inc points out that most of Israel’s armaments were gotten thanks to him. Squads of US F-16 and F-15 were classified military surplus and sold to Israel at a fraction of their value.

Judicial Inc also points out that Israel, a country of 4.8 million Russian and Polish Jewish émigrés, flies on one of the biggest Air Forces in the world, thanks to Dov. Conflict of interest here? Depends on what you’re interested in. That is, in 2001 Dov was CEO of SPS International, part of System Planning Corporation, a defense contractor majoring in electronic warfare technologies, including remote-controlled aircraft systems, and the notorious Flight Termination System (FTS) technology that could hijack even a hijacked plane and land or crash it wherever.

More from the resume: Wikipedia points out that Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of the Project for the New American Century’s position paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, advocating the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern Muslim nations.

As to Dov’s hell-raiser lineage, Judicial Inc points out that Grandpa Zakheim was born in 1870, Julius Zakheim (Zhabinka), in the Ukraine, a Russian rabbi who married a relative of Karl Marx. He was a Menshevik/Bolshevik and played a leading role in the 1905 turmoil that paved the way for the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. The Bolshevik master plan called for the state of Israel, which was chosen for its proximity to the world's oil and an area of religious significance.

Dov’s Father, Rabbi Jacob I. Zakheim was born in 1910 and reared in Poland’s swarm of Zionist hard guys, read assassins and bombers. His Polish town, near Bilaystok, also brought us Yitzhak Shir, and family friends included Menachem Begin and Moshe Arens. Dov’s father was an active member of Betar, formed in 1923 in Riga, Latvia. Its goal was to control the Middle East (and its oil). It was known that the Jewish people needed their own country and they chose Palestine and claimed it a Jewish state “on both sides of the Jordan.”

Betar was in essence a terrorist organization formed because Zionists were sick of being chased from and arrested in country after country. They wanted both a place to escape and a base for their power. Betar joined forces with the Haganah, Irgun, and Stern gangs. With no prospect of a Jewish state in sight, they argued that armed struggle against the British was the only way. Since Britain occupied Palestine and was containing them they went on a blood feast of bombings that killed hundreds of British soldiers. The British pulled out, but the Zionists continue to maul the Arabs to this day.

For a concise history on the Formation of Israel in 1947, I suggest this link to theocracywatch.org.

For an interesting look at “The United States and the Recognition of Israel: A Chronology” compiled from Harry S. Truman and the Founding of Israel by Michael T. Benson, link above. For a rounded look at Israel, see Wikipedia.

Returning to Dov: he was born in Brooklyn in 1943 and attended exclusive Jewish schools, spent summers in Israel Zionist camps, which trained the Zionists of the future. As to Dov’s formal education, he graduated from Columbia University in 1970 and the University of Oxford in 1972. From 1973 to 75, he attended the London school of Jewish studies, described as a “Harry Potter” type cauldron; among the subjects Jewish supremacy, Advanced Bible, Talmud, Jewish Mysticism, Holocaust, Anglo-Judaica, and Zionism. After, he was ordained a Rabbi. From 1975 to 80, Zakheim was an adjunct professor at the National War College, Yeshiva University, Columbia University and Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut.

As he stepped into the Reagan administration, he talked them into funding development of the Lavi Fighter at a cost of $3 billion. The Lavi was a total flop and Israel dropped it, though it owed $450 million in contract fees that were cancelled. Israel, according to Judicial Inc, also created a story that China was eager to buy the Lavi. Zakheim convinced Reagan that China had to be sandbagged. Reagan gave Israel $500 million for its lost contracts. Reagan then threw in a wing of F-16’s as a bonus and sign of good will. Do we see a pattern here, personal, familial, career-wise, of over-the-top Israeli advocacy?

Again, during Zakheim’s tenure as Pentagon controller from May 4, 2001, to March 10, 2004, over $3 trillion dollars were unaccounted for. Additionally, military Information was jeopardized and military contractors billed the US for Israeli items: $50 million dollar fighter jets were rated as surplus and the list rolls on. As the scandal of the missing trillion dollars surfaced and Dov resigned, Israel was handed the finest fighter jets in the US inventory while 15 percent of US jets were grounded for lack of parts. In whose best interest was this?

But Dov is not alone. He is one of an elite group of Jewish Americans/Israelis who inter-marry and enter government. They and their Christian counterparts are called neocons and their sole purpose is directing US policy. Most of them are dual citizens and few serve in the US military. Think of Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Richard Perle, Ben Wattenberg, to mention a few. Whether their motivation is anger at the Muslim world, seen as a religious and territorial enemy, or a deep-rooted reaction to the Holocaust, the culmination of European anti-Semitism, their reactionary militarism becomes a world-threatening force unto itself. Hence our concern.

Dov and the World Trade Center

Perhaps not coincidentally in May 2001, when Dov served at the Pentagon, it was an SPS (his firm’s) subsidiary, Tridata Corporation, that oversaw the investigation of the first “terrorist” attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. This would have given them intimate knowledge of the security systems and structural blueprints of the World Trade Center. From the '90s through 2001, WTC Security was handled by Securacom, a Kuwait-American firm, on whose board Marvin Bush, the president’s brother, sat. After 9/11, Securacom was let go, changed its name to Stratosec, and was delisted from the Stock Exchange in 2002.

According to Conspiracy News.net writers Shadow and ‘Pax’ in Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy, (and I suggest you look at this link) “According to the SPC website (4), a recent customer at that time was Eglin AFB, located in Florida. Eglin is very near another Air Force base in Florida-MacDill AFB, where Dov Zakheim contracted to send at least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker lease agreement. (5)

”As the events of September 11, 2001 occurred, little was mentioned about these strange connections, and the possible motives and proximity of Dov Zakheim and his group. Since there was little physical evidence remaining after the events, investigators were left only with photographic and anecdotal evidence.

“There is a photograph of the Flight Termination System module, from their site.(5). Note it has a cylindrical shape, and is consistent with the size and shape of the object observed under the fuselage of flight 175.

“The Boeing lease deal involved the replacement of the aging KC-135 tanker fleet with these smaller, more efficient Boeing 767s that were to be leased by Dov Zakheim's group. The planes were to be refitted with refueling equipment, including lines and nozzle assemblies.”

(Remember both Flight 175, that hit the South Tower, and Flight 11, that hit the North Tower, were Boeing 767s. Flights 77 and 93 were 757s.)

“In the enlargement of flight 175’s photo, we can clearly see a cylindrical object under the fuselage, and a structure that appears to be attached to the right underside of the rear fuselage section.

”When seen in comparison, it is obvious that the plane approaching the Trade Center has both of these structures-the FTS module and the midair refueling equipment, as configured on the modified Boeing 767 tankers. Of particular interest is the long tube-like anomalous structure under the rear fuselage area of flight 175-this structure runs along the right rear bottom of the plane, as it also does on the Boeing 767 refueling tanker pictured.

”After considering this information, I [the author/s] am convinced that flight 175, as pictured on the news media and official reports, was in fact a refitted Boeing 767 tanker, with a Flight Termination System attached. Use of this system would also explain the expert handling of aircraft observed in both New York and Washington investigations, which has been officially credited to inexperienced flight school students.

“Since the refitted 767s were able to carry both passengers and a fuel load, as shown in this photo, it is likely that the plane designated Flight 175 was in fact a refitted 767 tanker, disguised as a conventional commercial passenger plane.

“As shown in this photo of a 767 being serviced, the FTS unit, when in position, would be small and unobtrusive enough to be fairly innocuous (at least to casual observers, such as passengers). The smallest circle indicates the size and position of the anomaly depicted in the photos of Flight 175. The larger circle, which is the size of the engine housing, shows the size of the anomaly in relation to the engine. Note the size and position of the open hatches on the engine housing, which would tend to discredit the widely held theory that the anomaly is an open hatch or cargo door.

“As the . . . diagram shows, all flights involved in the events traveled very near many military installations, and appear to have traveled in a manner suggesting guidance and possible transfer of the control of the planes among the bases.

”Since the evidence from the World Trade Center site was quickly removed, there is little concrete evidence of the involvement of Dov Zakheim, who has since left his position at the Pentagon. However, the proximity of Eglin AFB to MacDill AFB in Florida and Dov Zakheim's work via SPC contracts and the Pentagon leasing agreement on both of these installations, combined with SPC's access to World Trade Center structural and security information from their Tridata investigation in 1993, is highly suspicious. Considering his access to Boeing 767 tankers, remote control flight systems, and his published views in the PNAC document, it seems very likely he is in fact a key figure in the alleged terrorist attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001.”

EDITORIAL RESPONSE TO READERS' COMMENTS:

”In response to some of our readers who have questioned our premise that it was Rabbi Dov Zakheim who 'called for' the Pearl Harbor type of incident, we here at Conspiracy News Net acknowledge that the PNAC document was written by the likes of William Kristol and Donald Kagan, and therefore as the real brains behind the agenda they are the ones calling for it in a literal sense. However, we do stand by our assertion that the Rabbi called for it as well, insofar that he signed his name onto this document. If he signed it he agrees with it and therefore he is calling for it.

”Some of you have argued that we are singling out Rabbi Zakheim because he is Jewish, implying that we are pushing some sort of twisted anti-Semitic agenda while noting that he is not the only one who signed the PNAC document and therefore wondering why our article is about him and not the others. We do not mean to imply that the Rabbi acted alone, our article simply points out that Rabbi Zakheim had access to things like structural integrity, blueprints and any number of important facets of information about the WTC through his work with TRIDATA CORPORATION in the investigation of the bombing of the WTC in 1993.

“That he had access to REMOTE CONTROL Technology through his work at System Planning Corporation (SPC). That he had access to BOEING AIRCRAFT through a lease deal HE BROKERED while working at the Pentagon.

“ . . . Finally that he was part of a group of politically radical Straussian Neo-Conservatives, who, through their association with PNAC, called for restructuring of the Middle East, noting that a Pearl Harbor type of event MAY BE NEEDED to foster the frame of mind required for the American public to accept such a radical foreign policy agenda. In light of all this information we here at Conspiracy News Net stand by our statement that Mr. Zakheim not only called for the slamming of the WTC Towers on 9-11, but he activity took part in their demolition by providing the logistics necessary for such an attack to occur.”

Coda, a Bitter Frosting on the Cake

Whether or not you agree in whole or in part with these findings, here is an eye-opening article originally from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette by Milan Simonich. It is titled Army unit piecing together accounts of Pentagon attack, and from it comes this striking information in paragraph six . . ."One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck.”

Apart from the question of whether it was F 77 that struck the Pentagon, it is more than ironic that accountants, bookkeepers and budgets analysts, the very people who could pick up the financial frauds were struck. Especially since the hit was directed supposedly at the Office of Naval Intelligence.

Nevertheless, Dov is busy at his Booz Allen job, involved in Strategic Services and who knows what other dark plans as we speak, even as the Middle East is under heavy fire once again from Israel and its fervid ally, the US government.
Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York. Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

¿Intervención del Israeli Mossad en el caso de Florence Cassez en Mexico?

¿Intervención del Mossad en el caso de Florence Cassez? Y que tiene que ver con las ventas de armas?

Por Xavier Méndez Camacho “Ser inocente es peligroso, porque no se tienen coartadas”: Anónimo. ¿Florence Cassez es inocente?

Hago alusión al tema de “la francesa secuestradora”, por la reciente aparición de su libro “A la Sombra de mi Vida. Prisionera del Estado Mexicano” que ya circula en librerías y tiendas departamentales. Es un tema delicado porque detrás de todo el entramado se encuentran los Servicios de Inteligencia Israelíes, el sanguinario, temible y legendario Mossad, famoso por ser el principal Cazador de Nazis en el mundo y autor del rescate de rehenes de un avión en África ( Rescate Entebbe ) en julio de 1976. En febrero de 2006, siendo reportero del diario unomasuno publiqué una investigación del caso donde revelaba por primera vez que detrás de todo el montaje que preparó el ahora secretario de Seguridad Pública y entonces director de la Agencia Federal de Investigaciones (AFI) Genaro García Luna para las televisoras en el rancho “Las Chinitas” sobre la banda de secuestradores como “Los Zodiaco” se encontraba el jefe del Mossad para América Latina y México Eduardo Cuahutémoc Margolis Sobol. Unomásuno fue el único diario que en México se atrevió en ese momento a publicar mi investigación y sus ramificaciones en el caso por una simple razón. El propietario de unomásuno es árabe, Nahim Nibien Nahum y como todos sabemos, árabes y judíos tienen grandes diferencias. En medio de la investigación que realizaba, El Mossad se percató y fui vigilado por varios días mientras me entrevistaba en lugares discretos con los abogados de Florence Cassez y su familia y cruzaba información con diversas fuentes. Mi teléfono celular fue intervenido –como después me enteré- y hubo innumerables presiones al propietario de unomásuno para impedir que publicara. Recuerdo que una de ellas sucedió estando yo presente en sus oficinas. El director del Heraldo de Toluca le llamó para decirle que “unos amigos míos me dicen que vas a publicar el caso de la francesa secuestradora apoyándola. Te anticipo que mis amigos me dicen que detrás de todo este asunto está un señor muy peligroso que se llama Mossad ”. Ni siquiera el director del Heraldo de Toluca tenía idea de lo que es El Mossad ni de sus alcances. Aún así publicamos el reportaje en tres entregas; dimos a conocer la ubicación de sus oficinas; describimos cómo eran por dentro; revelamos que tenía una empresa fachada para cubrir sus actividades, incluso publicamos una fotografía de su pasaporte. Hay evidencia de que Margolis estuvo en la SIEDO el 9 de diciembre de 2005, cuando fue detenida Florence y en el Rancho Las Chinitas el día del montaje. Eduardo Morgolis nunca me desmintió pero hubo un silencio oficial. Ni una sola respuesta. Los demás medios de información, principalmente televisión y radio tampoco dieron seguimiento pese a que revelé dónde tenía su bunker El Mossad ( en la colonia Anzures, pegado a Polanco) y la implicación de Eduardo Margolis, el jefe de estos Servicios de Inteligencia, en el caso. La prensa mexicana se fue y se ha ido por el montaje de García Luna pero no ha querido tocar al temible Mossad. Hay una razón muy simple: la mayoría de los grandes medios de comunicación en el mundo se encuentran en manos de judíos, incluyendo el The New York Times y han cabildeado en la prensa mexicana para dejar a salvo, intocable, al espía Margolis. Su poder es grande. Ni siquiera Deniss Maeker en su “Punto de Partida” se atrevió a tocar el tema de Margolis. El fondo radica en que el hermano de Florence, de nombre Sébatien se involucró con Margolis en una empresa de “fachada” con razón social Radiancy de México S.A. de C.V., que supuestamente era distribuidora de equipo médico y estético. La investigación que realicé llegó hasta Tel Aviv pues ubicó ahí el domicilio y la verdadera actividad de Radiancy: venta de misiles y armamento. Cuando Sébastien se dio cuenta de lo que hacía el agente israelí quiso desafanarse pero fue amenazado por Margolis. El 21 de diciembre del 2004 la esposa de Sébastien, Vanessa Mercado, recibió una llamada de parte del citado socio, en donde los amenazó a ambos de muerte y de secuestro en contra de sus dos hijos de 4 y 5 años, y les dijo “no saben con quien se están metiendo”. En su libro, Florence relata que durante su detención le preguntaron si conocía a Eduardo Margolis. Ella contestó que sí. El jefe policíaco que la interrogó le dijo: “¡Te va a chingar Margolis!”. Y le repitió: “¡ No tienes ninguna oportunidad. ¡Te va a chingar Margolis!”. “En la mesa, frente a mí, uno de los hombres tira tarjetas de presentación de cuando trabajaba para Sébastien. Llevan mi nombre, claro, y el logo de la empresa de material médico que tenía mi hermano con Eduardo Margolis”. En los últimos tiempos el caso de la “francesa secuestradora” ha tomado relevancia porque incluso enfrentó a los presidentes de México y Francia. Sarkozy está empeñado en devolver a su patria a la francesa para que allí cumpla condena, o le otorgue el perdón porque el presidente de Francia “cree en su inocencia”. Y solamente así ha podido salir a la luz pública el nombre del agente israelí y tímidamente algunos medios ahora lo mencionan pero se cuidan de no involucrar directamente al Mossad. Por eso da risa la carta que Eduardo Margolis envió a Proceso en abril, en su derecho de réplica, cuando Homero Campa abordó el tema. Ahí afirma que no conoce a Israel Vallarta; que no ha tenido ninguna relación de amistad o de negocio con dicha persona y “…por último le afirmo, que no soy jefe de seguridad de ninguna comunidad, ya que me dedico a ejercer el comercio de manera lícita”. Homero Campa le contesta que “los señalamientos sobre su persona no fueron realizados por el reportero, sino que están contenidos en la averiguación previa PGR/SIEDO/UEIS/190/2005 –relativa a los casos de Florence Cassez e Israel Vallarta– y que se reprodujeron sin emitir juicios. “La información sobre la supuesta relación entre Margolis y Vallarta la describió este último en la declaración preparatoria que rindió el 9 de marzo de 2006 y que forma parte del referido expediente judicial, del cual Proceso tiene una copia. Puntualizo además que la nota a la que alude el señor Margolis se titula Un “thriller” lleno de trampas y no “Relación Turbulenta Israel Vallarta”; que apareció en Proceso 1692 y no en el número 1693, y que en el texto nunca se afirma que él sea “jefe de seguridad” de alguna comunidad”. Han pasado cuatro años desde la publicación del reportaje en unomásuno y de la golpiza que me propinaron por meterme en este caso de la cual todavía no me recupero completamente. Sucede que a los 15 días de haber revelado la identidad del jefe del Mossad, en la colonia Clavería tomé un mini taxi a las 3 de la tarde, luego de que mi vehículo se descompusiera y lo dejara estacionado sobre la avenida Cuitláhuac. A las dos cuadras el chofer hizo una parada y se subieron dos individuos, se sentaron junto a mi y uno de ellos sacó un minibat, de esos que usan para checar llantas; me amenazó, sacó mis documentos del saco y comprobó mi identidad. Al saber que era el reportero Xavier Méndez comenzaron a golpearme con el bat con inaudita saña. Me quebraron una mano con la que me defendí la cara, me rompieron la nariz, una costilla y me transfiguraron el rostro. Después de pasearme por la ciudad por más de tres horas me tiraron allá por el rumbo de Iztapalapa y de ahí me fui por mis medios al hospital Magdalena de las Salinas. Antes de bajarme del auto me dijeron: “Para que no ande de metiche piche periodista”. Era un mensaje del Mossad. Algunos compañeros de la “fuente” de PGR me aconsejaron que denunciara en la Fiscalía Especial para Delitos Contra Periodistas y que le comentara a García Luna. Sabiendo las complicidades entre ellos no lo hice. Preferí guardar silencio, hice mis maletas y me vine a vivir a Cancún.

Alternative Media Host Alex Jones Meets Corporate Media Puppets

First watch this video to get an introduction to Alex via the corporate media lens:

Yes, I understand Alex looks intense and out of control.  I know how he feels.  He is mad as hell that we have been lied to for so long on so many levels.  You may think it is a matter of left versus right, but you are so very wrong.  From the Federal Reserve Act to MLK to JFK, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, 9/11, and now Mali.

Unfortunately when you don't have big corporate media budgets it is very hard to get your message across to the masses so that they will take appropriate action.

Ask yourself some questions:

Do you believe that all individuals in the City, State, and Federal government are acting in the best interest of the people of the United States of America?

Do you believe that corporate media, largely controlled by 5 major corporations report the news of the world in an accurate fashion that best represents what's really happening? Do they question government and other corporate actions sufficiently enough to keep them in check?

Are you satisfied with the job of the US President? The US Congress?

What is wrong with our current social and economic environment? What are the root causes of our problems?

Do you really think the source of all our problems is as simple as "the damn liberals" or the warmongering Republicans?

How is it possible that US foreign and domestic policy have been virtually the same for nearly 40 years?

You need only to look at the shared think tanks and associations of White House administrations over the past 40 years to realize they all have ONE THING in COMMON.

The Council on Foreign Relations.

That is where you should be looking.  Research the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) and their reference to a need for a "new Pearl Harbor".

Watch 9/11 in 5 Minutes.  Does it make you think there's something fishy about the official story? Then watch a film that just came out and has won several awards, Operation Terror and consider the .

Then decide if Alex Jones or other alternative media deserve tin foil hats.